综合训练法预防晕船病效果评估

发布时间：2018-04-20 12:33

本文选题：综合训练法 + 预防　；参考：《解放军预防医学杂志》2006年03期

【摘要】：目的通过对209名大学生晕船病易感性预测,对其中128名大学生进行预防晕船病训练和训练效果评估,以建立预防晕船病综合训练方案和评估方法。方法采用四柱秋千诱发试验结合个人史和心理学问卷、Graybiel晕动病评分法,进行晕船病易感性预测。根据预测结果分组训练,实验1、2组进行预防晕船病综合训练,两组训练的方法相同,但时间不一,对照组进行传统训练。训练结束后对训练效果进行陆上和海上评估。结果陆上评估显示,实验1组、实验2组训练后晕动病发病率分别为58.62%、61.54%,明显低于对照组(93.46%,P0.01);实验1组、实验2组训练后Graybiel评分法得分分别为(4.05±4.86)、(3.88±4.26),明显低于对照组(11.37±8.28,P0.01),耐受时间分别为(17.91±3.50)min(、18.89±2.73)min,明显高于对照组〔(15.59±5.11)min,P0.01〕,耐受指数分别为(88.89±19.01)(、91.13±14.51)明显高于对照组(70.28±27.59,P0.01),实验1组、实验2组Graybiel评分法分级程度重的人数构成明显低于对照组(P0.01),表明实验1组、实验2组训练效果优于对照组。实验2组训练前后Gray-biel评分得分差值(7.83±7.97)高于实验1组(3.50±5.76,P0.05),表明实验2组训练效果优于实验1组。海上评估显示,在3、4级海况时,实验1组Graybiel评分得分分别为(4.31±7.29、2.83±3.57),明显低于未训练组(10.50±7.52、5.95±5.74,P0.05),说明实验1组训练可有效预防3、4级海况下的晕船病发生。结论在陆上进行综合训练法预防晕船病的效果优于传统训练法,在3、4级海况时能有效预防晕船病发生。
[Abstract]:Objective to predict the susceptibility of 209 college students to seasickness and to evaluate the effect of training on the prevention of seasickness among 128 college students in order to establish a comprehensive training scheme and evaluation method for the prevention of seasickness. Methods the susceptibility to seasickness was predicted by using four-column swing induction test combined with individual history and psychological questionnaire Graybiel motion sickness score. According to the predicted results, group 1 and group 2 were trained to prevent seasickness. The two groups had the same training method, but different time. The control group received traditional training. The training effect is evaluated on land and at sea after training. Results the onshore assessment showed that the incidence of motion sickness after training in experimental group 1 and experimental group 2 was 58.62 and 61.54 respectively, which was significantly lower than that in control group (93.46P 0.01). After training, the scores of Graybiel score were 4.05 卤4.86 卤3.88 卤4.26, respectively, which were significantly lower than that of control group (11.37 卤8.28), P 0.01a, tolerance time was 17.91 卤3.50 min, 18.89 卤2.73 min, significantly higher than that of control group (15.59 卤5.11 min, P 0.01), and the tolerance index was 88.89 卤19.01 min, 91.13 卤14.51) significantly higher than that of control group (70.28 卤27.9 min, P 0.011), and the tolerance index of experimental group 1 was significantly higher than that of control group. The number of people with heavy Graybiel grade in experiment 2 was significantly lower than that in control group (P 0.01), which indicated that the training effect of experimental group 2 was better than that of control group. The difference of Gray-biel score before and after training in group 2 was 7.83 卤7.97, which was higher than that in group 1 (3.50 卤5.76), which indicated that the effect of training in group 2 was better than that in group 1. At sea level, the Graybiel score of group 1 was 4.31 卤7.29 卤2.83 卤3.57, which was significantly lower than that of untrained group (10.50 卤7.52 卤5.95 卤5.74 P0.05N). Conclusion the comprehensive training on land is more effective than the traditional training method in preventing seasickness, and it can effectively prevent seasickness in 3 ~ 4 sea condition.
【作者单位】：南京医科大学公共卫生学院第二军医大学体育教研室第二军医大学新药评价中心南京军医学院属医院海军眩晕研究治疗中心南京军医学院属医院海军眩晕研究治疗中心南京军医学院军体教研室第二军医大学体育教研室南京军医学院军体教研室
【基金】：全军“十五”指令性项目课题(No.01L053)
【分类号】：R83

【参考文献】