招收飞行学员体格检查标准适宜性评估

发布时间：2018-06-21 22:07

本文选题：飞行人员 + 体格标准　；参考：《解放军医学杂志》2012年03期

【摘要】：目的评估招收飞行学员体格检查标准能否满足飞行学员医学选拔的需要。方法分3个步骤实施招收飞行学员体格检查标准的评估。第一步,编制调查手册。根据标准条款适宜性评估涉及的主要因素,编制由适宜性评估及使用情况调查两部分内容组成的调查手册。第二步,筛选专家。采用社会调查学的方法,选择119名专家(其中招飞体检专家98人,航空临床医学专家21人)对359个标准条款进行适宜性评估,并分析评估结果的可靠性。第三步,制定判断标准。根据专家的选择来判断条款的价值。若某一标准条款被超过80%以上的专家评估为适宜,则适宜性高;若低于60%,则适宜性低。结果发放调查手册134份,回收128份,专家参加评估的积极指数为0.95,而权威系数=0.86。在359个条款中,有271条(占75.5%)的适宜性获得专家认可,而有27条(占7.5%)未得到专家的普遍认可,多为不易把握的功能评价条款。结论尽管"招飞标准"大多数条款的适宜性获得专家认可,但仍有少数条款的适宜性不被专家普遍接受,应结合实际使用情况予以重点关注。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate whether the standard of medical examination for flight cadets can meet the needs of medical selection of flight cadets. Methods three steps were used to evaluate the physical examination standard of the flight cadets. The first step is to compile an investigation manual. According to the main factors involved in the assessment of suitability of standard terms, a survey manual consisting of two parts of suitability assessment and use survey is compiled. The second step is to screen experts. According to the method of social investigation, 119 experts (98 medical experts and 21 experts in aeronautical clinical medicine) were selected to evaluate the suitability of 359 standard items, and the reliability of the evaluation results was analyzed. The third step is to establish a standard of judgment. Judge the value of the terms according to the expert's choice. If a standard clause is evaluated as appropriate by more than 80% of the experts, the suitability is high, and if less than 60%, the suitability is low. Results 134 copies of survey manual were distributed and 128 copies were recovered. The positive index of experts participating in the evaluation was 0. 95, while the authority coefficient was 0. 86. Out of 359 articles, 271 (75.5%) were approved by experts, while 27 (7.5%) were not generally accepted by experts, most of which were difficult to grasp. Conclusion although the suitability of most articles of the criteria is recognized by experts, there are still a few articles which are not generally accepted by experts, and should be paid more attention to according to the actual application.
【作者单位】：空军航空医学研究所;空军北京招飞体检队;
【基金】：全军“十一五”科技攻关项目(08G044)~~
【分类号】：R851

【相似文献】