肿瘤标志物预测孤立性肺结节恶性概率模型的建立与初步评价
[Abstract]:Objective to establish a mathematical model to predict the malignant probability of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) by using tumor markers and to evaluate its clinical value. Methods the age, sex, smoking history, symptoms, maximum diameter of nodules, location and pathology of nodules, and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA),) cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen (CYFRA21-1) were studied in 250 patients with SPN. The level of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) was screened by two-class Logistic regression and the Logistic regression model was established. To evaluate the accuracy of the model by drawing the operating characteristic curve (ROC) and calculating the area under the curve (AUC), and comparing with Mayo model to evaluate the clinical value of the model. Results CEA (P0. 002) 5.921 ~ 95CII = 1. 968 ~ 17. 819), CYFRA21-1 (P0. 046) ~ 2.500 ~ 95 ~ 95 CI = 1.018 ~ 6. 142), symptoms (P ~ 0. 010 OR2. 384 ~ 95), nodule maximum diameter (P ~ 0. 001, P ~ 0. 001), nodule diameter (P ~ 0. 001, P ~ 0. 001), symptom (P ~ 0. 010 ~ 0. 010 OR2. 384 ~ 95 CI = 1. 234 ~ 4.607). OR=2.331,95%CI=1.441~3.773) is associated with benign and malignant SPN. The prediction model was established as follows: P=ex/ (1 ex), XML-1.991 0.869 脳 symptom 0.846 脳 CEA 0.916 脳 CYFRA21-1;) fitted well with Hosmer-Lemeshow test model (P0. 691); When the cut-off point was 0.636, the sensitivity was 63.5 and the specificity was 71.2; The predictive model (AUC:0.734 卤0.033) was compared with the Mayo model (AUC:0.792 卤0.047) recommended by the guidelines. The difference was not statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion CEA,CYFRA21-1, symptoms and the maximum diameter of nodules are independent risk factors for malignant SPN, and the Logistic regression model established from this model has high accuracy and good clinical value.
【作者单位】: 滨州医学院烟台附属医院呼吸内科;滨州医学院烟台附属医院统计室;烟台毓璜顶医院血管外科;大连医科大学附属第二医院呼吸内科;
【分类号】:R734.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李慎江;肖湘生;刘士远;李惠民;李成洲;张沉石;;恶性孤立性肺结节血流模式与结节大小的关系探讨[J];中国肺癌杂志;2008年01期
2 章智荣;毛友生;;孤立性肺结节病变的诊断与处理策略[J];中国肺癌杂志;2013年09期
3 谈高 ,郝丽萍 ,张晋昕 ,李占军 ,杜中立 ,章作铨 ,洪国斌 ,彭秀斌 ,李坤炜 ,罗永辉;肺外肿瘤与合并孤立性肺结节发生率关系初探[J];影像诊断与介入放射学;2003年02期
4 吴一龙;蒋国j;廖美琳;周清华;陆舜;王俊;王长利;傅渝;程颖;赫捷;张力;杨学宁;许林;黄诚;汤鹏;毛伟敏;周彩存;宋启斌;周清;;孤立性肺结节的处理[J];循证医学;2009年04期
5 周友俊;邓智勇;刘长江;李高峰;向旭东;贾莉;刘超;;~(99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT与定位CT融合显像诊断孤立性肺结节的价值[J];昆明医科大学学报;2014年01期
6 罗清泉;;老年孤立性肺结节临床处理选择[J];实用老年医学;2014年08期
7 王俊;;老年孤立性肺结节诊断的进展[J];实用老年医学;2014年08期
8 公长春;肖喜刚;;64排螺旋CT扫描对恶性孤立性肺结节的影像诊断[J];牡丹江医学院学报;2008年02期
9 高春民;左传田;李守波;钱立宇;谭军涛;;孤立性肺结节电视辅助胸腔镜手术的临床研究[J];中国癌症防治杂志;2010年02期
10 廖栩鹤;王荣福;范岩;张建华;王彦福;康磊;;孤立性肺结节—周围型腺癌1例[J];肿瘤学杂志;2011年11期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 余苔痕;吴恩福;郑祥武;姜亿一;叶彩儿;;恶性孤立性肺结节螺旋CT诊断[A];2007年浙江省放射学学术年会论文汇编[C];2007年
2 王昕s,
本文编号:2409773
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2409773.html