重审“现代新儒学”:评“大陆新儒家”的相关论述

发布时间：2018-01-02 14:18

本文关键词：重审“现代新儒学”:评“大陆新儒家”的相关论述　出处：《天府新论》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：以“大陆新儒家”命名的研究群体,将其儒学定位为政治儒学,将“现代新儒学”定位为心性儒学。近期这个群体中有学者更认为,现代新儒学将作为经学的儒学降格为现代分科学术,不是发扬光大儒学,而是肢解了儒学。加之“现代新儒学”第二代的学术舞台在港台、海外,他们因此失去了儒学主体地域的直接关怀,而且无法直接回应中国大陆的价值重建、制度再造和生活需要。在大陆新儒家立足中国重建经学形态的儒学之际,现代新儒学的中国使命似乎被终结了。大陆新儒家的这些断定颇可商榷。当代中国不能偏离现代发展轨道,大陆新儒家完全拒斥西方、闭门造车的做法,会误导中国的现代化。以中国的现代转变为基线,重审现代新儒学的价值主张与学理贡献,理应得到国人的首肯。
[Abstract]:The research group of new Confucianism "named the political orientation of Confucianism, Confucianism," Modern Neo Confucianism "as Confucianism. Recently this group has more scholars that modern Neo Confucianism as the classics of Confucianism in the modern division relegated to the academic, not developed Confucianism, but dismembered Confucianism in addition to the" modern new Confucianism ". The second generation of the academic arena in Hong Kong and Taiwan and overseas, they lost the direct concern of Confucianism subject areas, and unable to respond directly to China, value reconstruction, system reconstruction and living needs. In Lu Xinru's Chinese based reconstruction classics form of Confucianism, modern new Confucianism China the mission seems to be ended. The new Confucianism that can be quite questionable. Contemporary Chinese can not deviate from the track of development of modern new Confucianism, the complete rejection of the west, behind closed doors will mislead the practice The modernization of China, taking the modern transformation of China as the baseline, reexamining the value proposition and academic contribution of Modern Neo Confucianism, should be the first consent of the Chinese.

【作者单位】：清华大学政治学系;
【正文快照】： 近几年,“大陆新儒家”(1)的一些朋友、尤其是“大陆新儒教”(2)的朋友,把自己阐述立场的前提,设定为否定“现代新儒学”。其所针对,自然不仅仅是“港台新儒学”,而是整个“现代新儒学”。“港台新儒学”属于现代新儒学的第二代,现代新儒学肇源于20世纪20年代,1949年转移到港

【相似文献】