人文之源与情性之教

发布时间：2018-01-16 05:02

本文关键词：人文之源与情性之教　出处：《高教发展与评估》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：泛览当下的东亚乃至全球,教育理念面临的严峻挑战转为人文理想与人文环境的日渐式微乃至急剧恶化。这一现象并非仅仅基于科学主义、实用主义对理想主义、人文精神的轧撵。就人文学术内部的当代教育现状而言,传统东方曾经十分擅长的安顿身命的工夫进路,固然早已在当下知识结构与学科建制中荡然无存;近代西方曾风靡一时的理想主义哲学,也因无绵密扎实的可依循实践的办法来楔入人的实际生命,终被视为悬虚而玄虚。理想如果不想成为空想,就必须接续现实的原始根源。“20世纪最大的人文学者”唐君毅寻求到的这一“理想的现实的原始根源”是作为中国哲学重要范畴之一的“性情”。人文精神尽管遭遇重重非难,于人的生命存在与实在,却未必当真已经过时。正因为人文精神在当代呈现的低迷无助,亦基于我们当下的知识形构与文化处境,人文价值的初源起于何处不得不成为重振人文精神的原始拷问。本文试图提供关于新实践主体养成问题的一点初步思考,这也是“人文之源”与“情性之教”之间的关键链接。
[Abstract]:Looking at the present East Asia and even the whole world, the severe challenge to the educational idea turns into the gradual decline and even the sharp deterioration of the humanistic ideal and the humanistic environment. This phenomenon is not just based on scientism. Pragmatism banishes idealism and humanism. In terms of the present situation of contemporary education in the humanities, the traditional oriental has been very good at settling down the road. Of course, it has already disappeared in the present knowledge structure and discipline system. The idealistic philosophy once popular in the modern West, because there is no close and solid way to follow the practical approach to wedge into the actual life of human beings, will eventually be regarded as hypocrisy and hypocrisy. Ideal if do not want to become utopian. In 20th century, Tang Junyi sought the "original origin of ideal reality", which is one of the important categories of Chinese philosophy. The humanistic spirit, despite all the blame. The existence and reality of human life may not really be out of date. It is precisely because the humanistic spirit in the contemporary downturn is helpless, but also based on our current knowledge configuration and cultural situation. Where the initial origin of the humanistic value has to become the original torture to reinvigorate the humanistic spirit. This paper attempts to provide some preliminary thoughts on the cultivation of the new subject of practice. This is also the key link between the source of humanity and the teaching of love.
【作者单位】：中国艺术研究院中国文化研究所;
【分类号】：G640
【正文快照】： *本文为作者应本刊之约撰写的系列文章“性情教育如何可能”之二。——编者注一昔年唐君毅、牟宗三、徐复观诸人于海外倡立中国“第三阶段之儒学”,乃为针对第一阶段儒学(孔、孟、荀之对人之当然义理之正面立论)与第二阶段儒学(宋明理学之重此当然之义理之本源所在之心性之自

【相似文献】