评“古史辨派”的《周易》筮法观

发布时间：2018-01-29 07:19

本文关键词： 筮法古史辨派二重证据法　出处：《周易研究》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在20世纪初社会制度发生剧烈变化之时,以"古史辨派"为代表的中国学人本着怀疑的态度,开启了重新审视和批判传统经学理念的学术风潮。本文通过分析"古史辨派"的代表人物顾颉刚、李镜池和容肇祖三位学者对《周易》中筮法思想的认识,一方面展现了20世纪初《周易》筮法观念的流变与发展情况,另一方面分析了"古史辨派"在《周易》筮法相关问题上所存在的"疑古之过",进而主张在客观评判"古史辨派"的得失之余,运用"二重证据法"使中国传世经典文献在对"古史辨派"的不断扬弃中获得新生。
[Abstract]:At the beginning of 20th century, when the social system changed dramatically, the Chinese scholars, represented by the "Ancient History differentiation School", were sceptical. Through the analysis of Gu Jiegang, Li Jingchi and Rong Zhaozu, the representative figures of the School of Ancient History, the author analyzes the understanding of divination and law thought in the Book of changes by three scholars: gu Jiegang, Li Jingchi and Rong Zhaozu. On the one hand, it shows the evolution and development of the concept of divination at the beginning of 20th century, on the other hand, it analyzes the "doubt of the ancient times" in the "Ancient History differentiation School" in the related problems of the divination method of "the Book of changes". Besides objectively judging the gains and losses of the School of Ancient History differentiation, it is advocated to use the double evidence method to give new life to the Chinese classical literature in the process of sublation and abandonment of the School of Ancient History Discrimination.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学文学院汉语国际推广研究所;
【分类号】：B221
【正文快照】： 20世纪对于中国文化而言,大抵是数千年间少有的变局,特别是社会制度的激变,使得学术发展也是“城头变幻大王旗”。这种变化突出体现在两个方面:其一是传统经学地位的变化与学人学者对于传统学术态度的变化,其二则是外来学术文化对于传统经学的冲击以及经学自身求变的诉求。随

【相似文献】