先秦时期自然状态思想与理论建构

发布时间：2018-02-15 01:59

本文关键词： 先秦思想自然状态命运共同体理论建构　出处：《世界经济与政治》2017年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：先秦思想家普遍从"天下"(世界)的角度思考人类社会的战争与和平。先秦思想家以自然状态假定为出发点,通过探讨自然状态瓦解和崩溃的原因,构建了关于世界和平与战争的理论,进而提出了有针对性的对策和措施,其理论目标和归宿都指向了理想世界。道家、儒家、法家、墨家等思想流派基于相同的理论范式,坚持从小到大、由内而外的层次分析方法,提出了不同的理论解释和对策建议,引起了学派之间激烈的理论论战,奠定了后世中国文化发展的基本范式。先秦自然状态思想与近代西方思想家论述有诸多相通之处,二者之间可以展开比较和对话,进而梳理出中国传统文化与当代国际关系理论流派之间的知识谱系。先秦自然状态思想遵循了理论假设、因果分析与案例检验、政策推论等基本理论建构过程。这些理论成果不仅为中国国际关系理论研究积累了丰富的思想源泉,而且为我们今天的理论创新提供了灵感,同时也为当前国际关系与外交实践提供了有益的历史参考和政策借鉴。
[Abstract]:Pre-Qin thinkers generally considered the war and peace of human society from the angle of "the world". The pre-Qin thinkers took the assumption of natural state as the starting point and discussed the causes of the disintegration and collapse of the natural state. The theory of world peace and war is constructed, and the corresponding countermeasures and measures are put forward. Its theoretical goal and destination point to the ideal world. Taoism, Confucianism, Legalism, Mohism and other schools of thought are based on the same theoretical paradigm. Insisting on the hierarchical analysis method from small to large, from inside to outside, putting forward different theoretical explanations and countermeasures, which caused fierce theoretical debate among schools. It establishes the basic paradigm of the development of Chinese culture in later generations. There are many similarities between the thought of natural state in the pre-Qin period and the exposition of modern western thinkers, and the comparison and dialogue between the two can be carried out. And then combing out the knowledge genealogy between the traditional Chinese culture and the contemporary school of international relations theory. The pre-Qin natural state thought followed the theoretical hypothesis, causality analysis and case study. The process of constructing basic theories, such as policy inference, has not only accumulated a rich source of thought for the theoretical study of China's international relations, but also provided inspiration for our theoretical innovation today. At the same time, it also provides useful historical reference and policy reference for current international relations and diplomatic practice.
【作者单位】：西安外事学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目(批准号:16XGJ002)对本项研究的资助
【分类号】：B22;D80

【相似文献】