事件本体论与心理原因:戴维森行动哲学的新视域

发布时间：2018-03-09 02:21

本文选题：事件　切入点：心理事件　出处：《江西社会科学》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在当代英美分析哲学竭力拒斥乃至取消内在心理世界的背景下,戴维森却尝试恢复用主体意向解释行动这一古老的行动哲学传统。为实现此目标,他提出了事件本体论的核心主张。在事件本体论中,戴维森一方面从个别事件的时空区域化本质出发,坚持唯物主义的物理性世界立场;另一方面又在区分事件本身与事件描述的前提下,通过把心理摹状词视作心理事件标签的方式,赋予内在心理世界存在的合法性,以及利用心理性事件解释物理性行为的合法性。在事件本体论的视域下,戴维森的行动哲学看似调和了决定论与自由意志、科学世界观与常识心理学、唯物主义与二元论之间的对立,但最终却因心理事件的语言学特质与诉诸心理解释的工具主义方法论,陷入心理副现象论、目的论因果观以及非命题态度等问题的困境中。
[Abstract]:In contemporary Anglo American analytic philosophy to reject or even cancel the inner world in the background, Davidson has tried to restore the main intention explain the action of this ancient tradition. The philosophy of action to achieve this goal, he proposed the core proposition. In the event of event ontology ontology, Davidson from the perspective of the regional nature of individual space the event, adhering to the materialistic world physical position; on the other hand, the premise description and distinguish events in the event itself, through the psychological description as a psychological event label, endowed with inner psychological legitimacy of the existence of the world, and the legitimacy of the use of psychological events to explain physical behavior in the event. From the perspective of ontology, Davidson's philosophy seems to reconcile determinism and free will, the scientific world outlook and commonsense psychology, materialism and dualism between the But in the end, because of the linguistic characteristics of psychological events and the instrumentalist methodology of psychological explanation, it falls into the dilemma of psychological paranophenomenalism, teleological causality and non proposition attitude.

【作者单位】：洛阳师范学院马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“东西方心灵哲学及其比较研究”(12ZD120) 河南省高等学校青年骨干教师资助计划项目“当代心智哲学及其科学基础问题研究”(2015GGJS-119) 河南省教育厅人文社会科学重点项目“当代西方心灵哲学中的新自然主义研究”(2016-ZD-007)
【分类号】：B08

【相似文献】