名、字与概念范畴

发布时间：2018-04-01 09:44

本文选题：名　切入点：字　出处：《杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：这里作者想要申论五个重点:一则说明义理有时可以先于训诂,有时则训诂宜先于义理,并无确定的途径。二则借章太炎《原名》一文的论述说明"名"的建立与系统化,和人类对天地万物的认知活动密切相关,研究"名"应该从认知的过程与限制思考先秦诸子开展其"名"学的途径。三则借《郭店楚简·大一生水》"名字章"之说,析论"名"与"字"的范畴。四则引张岱年《中国古典哲学概念范畴要论》,评述"名"、"字"、"概念"、"范畴"的纠葛,认为四者难以区分,亦不宜勉强区分,因为汉字具形音义统一的特性,"义"常与形音相纠缠。当前要务是建立一个简便精准的名称,以统摄诸名。五则举"中庸"、"独"、"集义、集虚"、"性善"等四个例子,说明研究范畴,不可囿于学派派别,而忽视了不同学派对于同一范畴或故意展现不同诠释的可能。
[Abstract]:Here the author wants to explain five key points: one is to explain that righteousness and theory can sometimes be preceded by exegesis, and sometimes the exegesis should precede righteousness and theory, and there is no definite way to do so.Secondly, through the exposition of Zhang Taiyan's "original name", it is shown that the establishment and systematization of "name" is closely related to human cognition of everything.The study of "name" should consider the ways for the pre-Qin philosophers to carry out the study of "name" from the perspective of cognitive process and limitation.The third is to analyze the category of "name" and "character" by the theory of "name chapter" in the first year of Kuodian Chu bamboo slips.Quoting Zhang Dainian's Theory of Conceptual Category of Chinese Classical philosophy, commenting on the disputes between "name", "character", "concept" and "category", the author holds that the four are difficult to distinguish, nor should they be forced to distinguish.Because of the unity of shape and meaning of Chinese characters, meaning is often entangled with shape and sound.The immediate task is to establish a simple and precise name to govern the names.Five examples of "the mean", "independence", "collection of meaning, collection of void" and "good nature" show that the scope of research cannot be confined to the schools of thought, while neglecting the possibility of different schools showing different interpretations of the same category or intentionally.
【作者单位】：香港教育大学文学与文化学系;
【分类号】：B222

【相似文献】