回到马克思的逻辑——对顾钰民教授“商榷”的回应

发布时间：2018-04-10 19:40

本文选题：《资本论》 + 辩证逻辑　；参考：《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：对马克思政治经济学批判的研究,特别是对劳动价值论的研究,必须回到马克思的逻辑,以逻辑与历史的一致推动理论与实践的结合。按照马克思的逻辑,第一,创造价值的只能是作为特指的"抽象劳动"而不是作为泛指的"劳动";第二,"实际上真实的"抽象劳动只是随着市场的发育而逐步形成的;第三,从个别劳动到特殊劳动再到一般劳动,是体现在价值形式中的抽象劳动发展的几个阶段;第四,拜物教的要害并不是"对物的崇拜"而是误把人与人交换劳动的关系当成了单纯的物与物相交换的关系,只有在拜物教消失以后才有可能实行马克思所说的"按劳分配"原则。
[Abstract]:The study of Marx's critique of political economy, especially the study of labor theory of value, must return to Marx's logic and promote the combination of theory and practice with the unity of logic and history.According to Marx's logic, first, what creates value can only be "abstract labor" as a special reference, not "labor" as a general reference; second, "real" abstract labor is only gradually formed with the development of the market; third,From individual labor to special labor to general labor are several stages of the development of abstract labor embodied in the form of value; fourth,The key point of fetishism is not "worship of things", but mistaking the relationship between people and people for exchanging labor as a simple relationship between things and things. Only after the disappearance of fetishism can the principle of "distribution according to work" described by Marx be carried out.
【作者单位】：中共上海市委党校第一分校;
【基金】：上海市社会科学基金委托课题“马克思主义的整体性研究”(2016WZX020);上海市社会科学基金课题“生态资本主义与当代中国绿色发展的实现机制研究”(2016BKS454)
【分类号】：B03

【参考文献】