论生命政治与批判理论的和解

发布时间：2018-04-19 17:02

本文选题：生命政治 + 批判理论　；参考：《国外理论动态》2017年10期

【摘要】：本文在瓦特的《生命的共和国》的基础上探讨了生命政治与批判理论达成和解的尝试。瓦特认为,现代新自由主义政府将生物学意义上的生命纳入政治合理性的考量中,从而构建了一种生命政治。瓦特为了抵制其"常规化"的影响,提出了一种有关生命的"积极政治",它摆脱了用于管理和统治生命的新技术。他指出,只有融合了民主与政治经济学批判的二元研究方法,才能驳斥新自由主义。这样一种批判的基础首先是由批判理论传统建立的。然而,要使当下的生命政治批判发挥作用,至关重要的是在批判理论话语中加强对自然生命或类生命概念的描述性和规范性理解。不过,这种重大转向引发了与批判理论的基本观点和价值观相冲突的几种解释性张力,而这些视角和价值观在瓦特提出的生命政治与批判理论的和解中并没有得到充分认可。
[Abstract]:Based on Watt's Republic of Life, this paper discusses the attempt of reconciliation between life politics and critical theory.According to Watt, modern neoliberal government takes biological life into consideration of political reasonableness and constructs a kind of life politics.To resist its "regularization" effect, Watt proposed a "positive politics" about life, rid itself of the new technology used to manage and govern life.He points out that neoliberalism can only be refuted by a dual approach that combines democratic and political economic criticism.The foundation of such a critique is first established by the tradition of critical theory.However, it is very important to strengthen the descriptive and normative understanding of the concept of natural life or quasi-life in the discourse of criticism theory in order to make the current life political criticism play its role.However, this major turn has led to several kinds of explanatory tensions that conflict with the basic viewpoints and values of critical theory, and these perspectives and values have not been fully recognized in the reconciliation of life politics and critical theory put forward by Watt.
【作者单位】：澳大利亚悉尼大学哲学系;中山大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B08

【相似文献】