从比较角度看有无之辩中的“李约瑟难题”

发布时间：2018-04-22 11:33

本文选题：有无之辩 + 迈农　；参考：《江汉论坛》2017年03期

【摘要】：中西方哲学有无之辩的比较研究尽管取得了大量积极成果,但也存在着一个不容小觑的缺陷,那就是,已有研究对19世纪末由迈农所建立的非存在理论及其所引发的旷日持久的、富有西方特色的有无之辩缺乏足够的了解和认知。而这一集多学科于一体的有无之辩代表的恰恰是西方有无之辩的最高成就和个性。西方现当代的有无之辩之所以后来居上,一是得益于分析方法的广泛运用,二是得益于逻辑学、语义学、语言哲学、心灵哲学、虚构哲学等的全面介入,甚至有与具体科学的互动。
[Abstract]:Although the comparative study of Chinese and Western philosophy has achieved a great deal of positive results, it also has a flaw that cannot be underestimated, that is, There has been a lack of sufficient understanding and cognition of the theory of nonexistence established by Mannon at the end of the 19th century and the long-lasting debate about whether or not it is rich in western characteristics. This multi-disciplinary debate represents the highest achievement and personality of western debate. The reason why modern and contemporary debate in the West transcends the former is that it benefits from the extensive application of analytical methods, and from the comprehensive intervention of logic, semantics, linguistic philosophy, philosophy of mind, fictional philosophy, etc. There is even interaction with specific science.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B516.59

【相似文献】