赫拉克利特的“对立面之统一性”学说再析——一种非辩证法的考察

发布时间：2018-05-09 08:37

本文选题：赫拉克利特 + 对立　；参考：《世界哲学》2017年02期

【摘要】：亚里士多德最早从逻辑规则出发批评赫拉克利特违反了矛盾律。当代西方学者借助数理逻辑手段进一步揭示了亚里士多德这一批评的逻辑意义,认为赫拉克利特对立矛盾学说之所以犯下逻辑错误,在于将对立面界定为同一性关系。本文通过流变学说对事物自身矛盾对立面的展现,认为赫拉克利特从经验观察的归纳出发提出了对立面之统一性而非同一性的论述,并进一步分析了赫拉克利特所揭示的互为矛盾事物的相互联系及其相互作用,认为赫拉克利特最终在事物生成、变化的宇宙论层面阐明了对立面的统一性关系。
[Abstract]:Aristotle first criticized Heraclitus for violating the law of contradiction on the basis of logical rules. Contemporary western scholars have further revealed the logical significance of Aristotle's criticism by means of mathematical logic, and hold that the logic error of Heraclitus's theory of opposites lies in the definition of opposites as identity relations. In this paper, according to the theory of rheology to reveal the contradictory opposites of things themselves, the author thinks that Heraclitus puts forward the discussion of unity of opposites rather than identity from the induction of empirical observation. The paper further analyzes the interrelation and interaction of the contradictory things revealed by Heraclitus, and concludes that Heraclitus finally clarifies the unity of opposites at the cosmological level of the creation and change of things.
【作者单位】：华侨大学哲学与社会发展学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(项目编号:12YJC720003)的阶段性成果华侨大学中央高校基本科研业务经费(项目编号:12SKBS211);华侨大学科研基金(项目编号:11HSK12)的资助
【分类号】：B502.13

【相似文献】