哲学变革与语言转换——从晚期海德格尔讨论班谈起

发布时间：2018-05-12 08:20

本文选题：哲学变革 + 语言转换　；参考：《社会科学家》2017年02期

【摘要】：新哲学或新思想的发生是否必然伴随着语言上的转换,这在语言哲学和哲学史上是历久弥新的问题。借助于海德格尔的指引,特别是马克思的原则启示,从语言转换的必要性、可能性和实现途径出发,能够对此一问题做出必要的澄清和回答。海德格尔的运思总体上厘定了语言同思想之间“非此不可”的关系。他想要突出思想相对语言的优先性,事实上又陷入了思想和语言相互规定的怪圈;想以新思想召唤出新的语言,却终究只能倚重语言的转变来促成思想之新生。所以,海德格尔既未实现语言转换也未完成思想变革。马克思抓住了更为基础的东西,即语言和思想之共同的外部根据——“感性活动”,由此对语言的“外部守护”和“内在澄清”才成其可能。因此,唯有马克思真正实现了话语的转换,同时也就是哲学变革的完成。
[Abstract]:Whether the occurrence of new philosophy or new thought is necessarily accompanied by the transformation of language is a new question in the history of philosophy and philosophy. With the help of Heidegger's guidance, especially the revelation of Marx's principles, this question can be clarified and answered in the light of the necessity, possibility and realization of language transformation. Heidegger's thinking generally defines the "indispensable" relationship between language and thought. He wanted to highlight the priority of thought over language, and in fact fell into a strange circle of mutual regulation between thought and language; he wanted to summon new language with new ideas, but he could only rely on the transformation of language to promote the renewal of thought. Therefore, Heidegger neither realized the language transformation nor completed the thought change. Marx grasped the more basic thing, that is, the common external basis of language and thought, "perceptual activity", thus the "external guardian" and "internal clarification" of language became possible. Therefore, only Marx realized the transformation of discourse and the completion of philosophical transformation.
【作者单位】：惠州学院政法系;
【分类号】：B516.54

【相似文献】