思想史研究中常见同语词概念混淆及其辨析方法

发布时间：2018-05-30 20:22

本文选题：思想史研究 + 概念辨析　；参考：《史学月刊》2017年09期

【摘要】：正思想史研究需要一定的方法,而方法应从概念辨析入手。概念辨析之于思想史研究,类似于考证之于历史研究,都属于基础性工作。在思想史研究中,有不少概念辨析的学术行为,但是鲜有学者对其方法进行总结。考虑到概念辨析的种类很多,有同语词概念辨析、近义词概念辨析、中西语词概念辨析等,相应的方法也不一而足,非一篇小文所能讲清,亦非一人所能胜任,故笔者择取其中最具基础
[Abstract]:A certain method is needed to study the history of positive thoughts, and the method should be analyzed from the concept. Concept discrimination in the history of thought, similar to textual research in the history of history, are basic work. In the study of the history of thought, there are many academic behaviors of concept discrimination, but few scholars sum up their methods. Considering that there are many types of conceptual discrimination, such as conceptual discrimination of synonyms, concepts of Chinese and western words, and so on, and there are many corresponding methods, which are neither clear nor competent in a single article, Therefore, the author chooses the most basic one.
【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院;
【分类号】：B2

【相似文献】