马里翁对笛卡尔形而上学体系的解读

发布时间：2018-06-22 01:07

  本文选题：笛卡尔 + 马里翁　； 参考：《世界哲学》2017年04期

【摘要】：马里翁认为在笛卡尔的哲学中存在着两种不同的本体—神学—论思想,一种以自我为基础(其基本的表达式是"ego cogito,ergo sum"),一种以上帝为核心(其基本的表达式是"ego sum,ego existo"),前者是一种并不完备的形而上学,后者则展现了笛卡尔的一种成熟的形而上学思想。但是,关于笛卡尔的这种成熟的形而上学思想及其体系,马里翁在其《笛卡尔哲学问题:方法与形而上学》和《笛卡尔哲学问题II:自我和上帝》中分别给出了两种并不相同的解释,本文认为我们可以大体上认可马里翁的第一种解释,同时应该对他的第二种解释保持谨慎态度。
[Abstract]:Marion believes that there are two different ontology-theo-theoretical ideas in Descartes' philosophy. One is self-based (its basic expression is "ego cogitoergo sum"), the other is more than the emperor (its basic expression is "ego existo"), the former is a kind of incomplete metaphysics, while the latter shows a mature metaphysical thought of Descartes. But about Descartes' mature metaphysics and its system, Marion gives two different interpretations in Descartes philosophical problems: method and Metaphysics, and Descartes philosophical problem II: self and God, respectively. This paper holds that we can generally agree with the first interpretation of Marion. At the same time, he should be cautious about his second interpretation.
【作者单位】： 南开大学哲学院;
【分类号】：B565.21;B565.59
，

本文编号：2050857