分析哲学之本真辨析——兼论分析哲学的起源及其与欧陆哲学之争

发布时间：2018-07-03 12:28

本文选题：分析哲学 + 欧陆哲学　；参考：《学术论坛》2017年05期

【摘要】：从源头上看,摩尔和罗素对英国唯心主义的反叛、弗雷格和罗素对逻辑主义的不懈追求以及维特根斯坦对语言混乱的澄清性工作导致了分析哲学的诞生。他们寻求通过分析的方法来解决哲学问题,并且坚信唯有如此哲学才有可能真正获得进步。自其创生以来,尽管分析哲学的受重视程度时有变化,然而无论是分析哲学的支持者还是反对者,他们都没有就"什么是分析哲学"达成共识。分析哲学不是一种学说,而是一种做哲学、探讨哲学问题的方式。尽管在分析哲学与欧陆哲学之间的交叉分类忽视了分析哲学在欧陆深厚的根基,但是一般来说,分析哲学家和欧陆哲学家确实不仅对哲学有着不同的理解,他们对哲学方法的认知也有着较大差异。
[Abstract]:From the source, Moore and Russell's rebellion against British idealism, Frege and Russell's unremitting pursuit of logicism and Wittgenstein's clarification of language confusion led to the birth of analytical philosophy. They sought analytical solutions to philosophical problems and believed that only in this way could real progress be achieved. Since its creation, although the degree of attention to analytical philosophy has changed, neither supporters nor opponents of analytical philosophy have reached a consensus on "what is analytical philosophy". Analytic philosophy is not a theory, but a way of doing philosophy and exploring philosophical problems. Although the cross-classification between analytic philosophy and continental philosophy ignores the deep foundation of analytic philosophy in Europe, generally speaking, analytic philosophers and continental philosophers do not only have different understandings of philosophy. Their understanding of philosophical methods is also quite different.
【作者单位】：西安交通大学人文社会科学学院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金第61批面上资助“分析哲学方法论在哲学咨询与治疗中的应用研究”(2017M613161)
【分类号】：B089

【相似文献】