古史辨易学辨正

发布时间：2018-08-02 18:25

【摘要】：20世纪20年代,顾颉刚引领的古史辨思潮兴起,在史学领域引起了巨大的反响。古史辨学者不仅讨论与三皇五帝有关的上古史问题,还讨论《易经》、《诗经》等经学问题,以及诸子学的儒、墨、道、法多家的问题,要求还原历史原貌,建立新史学体系。20世纪易学就在古史辨易学讨论的氛围中展开,出现了与此时期象数派、义理派发展并不相同的新路径。古史辨学者讨论了关于《周易》经传作者、年代、性质,孔子与《周易》关系,以及观象制器说等等问题,完全开辟此时期的易学新论域,之后半个世纪易学的发展还是在古史辨的论域中展开。因而,古史辨易学问题的来源,古史辨易学对前人易学的继承与发展,都是值得注意的。20世纪初,日本学界因为崔述的《考信录》掀起了疑古辨伪的思潮,早于古史辨思潮十几年,出现较早的日本疑古思潮对古史辨思潮的影响,以及此时期日本易学与古史辨易学的关系也都值得讨论。本文在结构上分六章。绪论,主要释题、介绍相关研究成果、篇章结构、研究方法。第一章以顾颉刚为主体,论述古史辨思潮展开的背景。第二章介绍传统主流易学思想和前人易学辨伪成果,并讨论古史辨易学辨伪的论题、思路对前人成果的继承与发展。第三章、第四章,是古史辨易学研究的主体,依史学论域分为：伏羲神农与上古史、文王与卦爻辞、孔子与《周易》、《周易》经传的性质及关系四部分,具体展开古史辨易学的发展脉络及其核心的论域。第五章,研究古史辨易学与日本疑古思潮易学辨伪的交互影响。第六章,对古史辨易学的总结与辨正。
[Abstract]:In the 1920s, Gu Jie-gang led the rise of ancient history discrimination, which caused a huge response in the field of historiography. The scholars of ancient history not only discussed the problems of ancient history related to the three emperors, but also discussed the study of Confucian classics such as the Book of changes and the Book of songs, as well as the problems of Confucianism, Mohism, Taoism, and Dharma in various schools of thought, asking for the restoration of the original appearance of history. The establishment of the new historiography system.20 ~ (th) century Yi study was carried out in the atmosphere of the discussion of the ancient history differentiation and Yi study, and there appeared a new path which was different from the development of the "number School" and the "righteousness School" in this period. Scholars of ancient history have discussed such issues as the author, the time, the nature, the relationship between Confucius and the Book of changes, as well as the theory of image-making device, and completely opened up the new field of study of the Book of changes in this period. After half a century, the development of the Book of changes is still in the field of ancient history. Therefore, the origin of the problem of the study of the differentiation of the ancient history, the inheritance and development of the study of the ancient history of the former, are noteworthy at the beginning of the 20th century. In the early 20th century, the Japanese academic circles set off a trend of thought on the discrimination of the ancient and false because of Cui Shu's "the record of the examination of the letter". Earlier than ten years ago, the influence of the early Japanese trend of thought on ancient history discrimination and the relationship between the Japanese Yi and the ancient history differentiation were also worth discussing. The structure of this paper is divided into six chapters. Introduction, main interpretation, introduction of relevant research results, text structure, research methods. The first chapter, with Gu Jie-gang as the main body, discusses the background of the ideological trend of ancient history. The second chapter introduces the traditional mainstream thought of Yi and the achievements of the former. It also discusses the topic of distinguishing the false from the ancient history, and the inheritance and development of the thought to the forefathers' achievements. The third chapter, the fourth chapter, is the main body of the study on the differentiation of ancient history. According to the field of historiography, it is divided into four parts: Fuxi Shennong and the ancient history, Wen Wang and the trigrams, Confucius and the Book of changes, and the Nature and relationship of the Book of changes. To develop the development of the ancient history differentiation and the core of the field. The fifth chapter studies the interaction between the study of the differentiation of ancient history and the Japanese trend of thought. Chapter six summarizes and corrects the study of the differentiation of ancient history.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：B221

【参考文献】