空间修复与“城市
发布时间：2018-08-12 14:55
【摘要】：照人本主义城市学家的观点,"城市病"是现代性问题的外化体现。不过,20世纪的西方马克思主义学者列斐伏尔、大卫·哈维、卡斯特、索贾等思想家却从"资本主义自身的空间修复"这一视角分析了"城市病"产生的现实根源,指出城市化是当代全球化的重要途径,在当代城市社会已经取代了以往工业社会的决定地位,城市空间是当代资本主义自我修复的主要途径。这一理论也是在现代性的视域下展开的,不过更具有批判性与针对性,并且延续了马克思主义政治经济学批判的方法,开辟了社会批判理论的新视角,直接指向资本主义制度本身。在当代西方马克思主义学者看来,"城市病"的根源在于资本化空间对于日常生活空间的侵占,因此,围绕着城市空间的控制权而展开的抗争将成为未来革命的焦点,即"城市权利"。然而,无论"城市病"还是空间修复本身所蕴含的内在矛盾都注定了,掠夺性的空间实践将引起城市的反叛与异化。如果说"城市病"了,必须反思使其致病的文明病根,我们认为,到一定程度之时,以新的文明理念为指导构建的城市将替代今天的城市样态。从根本上看,对于"城市病"的批判应该是对于现代性文明形态及其未来可能新文明形态的反思。
[Abstract]:According to the view of humanist urbanists, urban disease is the externalization of modernity. However, in the 20th century, Western Marxist scholars, such as Lefeivoll, David Harvey, Castor, Soja and other thinkers, analyzed the real causes of "urban disease" from the perspective of "the repair of the space of capitalism itself". It is pointed out that urbanization is an important way of contemporary globalization. In contemporary urban society, it has replaced the decisive position of the former industrial society, and urban space is the main way for contemporary capitalism to repair itself. This theory is also developed from the perspective of modernity, but it is more critical and targeted, and continues the method of Marxist political economic criticism, which opens up a new perspective of social criticism theory. Direct to the capitalist system itself. In the view of contemporary Western Marxist scholars, the root of "urban disease" lies in the encroachment of capitalized space on the daily living space. Therefore, the struggle around the control of urban space will become the focus of the future revolution. That is, "urban rights". However, whether the "urban disease" or the inherent contradictions contained in the space repair itself are doomed, the predatory practice of space will lead to the rebellion and alienation of the city. If we say that "urban disease", we must reflect on the causes of civilization disease, we believe that, to a certain extent, the new concept of civilization as the guide of the construction of the city will replace today's urban pattern. Fundamentally, the criticism of "urban disease" should be a reflection on the modern civilization form and its possible new civilization form in the future.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学哲学系/中国特色城镇化研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金“空间与资本:对《资本论》的当代解读”(项目编号:12BZX001)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B089.1
，
本文编号：2179404
[Abstract]:According to the view of humanist urbanists, urban disease is the externalization of modernity. However, in the 20th century, Western Marxist scholars, such as Lefeivoll, David Harvey, Castor, Soja and other thinkers, analyzed the real causes of "urban disease" from the perspective of "the repair of the space of capitalism itself". It is pointed out that urbanization is an important way of contemporary globalization. In contemporary urban society, it has replaced the decisive position of the former industrial society, and urban space is the main way for contemporary capitalism to repair itself. This theory is also developed from the perspective of modernity, but it is more critical and targeted, and continues the method of Marxist political economic criticism, which opens up a new perspective of social criticism theory. Direct to the capitalist system itself. In the view of contemporary Western Marxist scholars, the root of "urban disease" lies in the encroachment of capitalized space on the daily living space. Therefore, the struggle around the control of urban space will become the focus of the future revolution. That is, "urban rights". However, whether the "urban disease" or the inherent contradictions contained in the space repair itself are doomed, the predatory practice of space will lead to the rebellion and alienation of the city. If we say that "urban disease", we must reflect on the causes of civilization disease, we believe that, to a certain extent, the new concept of civilization as the guide of the construction of the city will replace today's urban pattern. Fundamentally, the criticism of "urban disease" should be a reflection on the modern civilization form and its possible new civilization form in the future.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学哲学系/中国特色城镇化研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金“空间与资本:对《资本论》的当代解读”(项目编号:12BZX001)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B089.1
，
本文编号：2179404
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2179404.html
