论谭嗣同的经典解读——以《春秋》《大学》为例

发布时间：2018-11-15 06:53

【摘要】：谭嗣同对《春秋》的解读沿着公羊学发挥微言大义的致思方向和价值旨趣展开,故而对《春秋公羊传》推崇有加。他认为:《春秋》以维新为宗旨,书中的内容围绕着维新这个主题展开;《春秋》秉持"称天而治"的原则,这证明了孔子主张平等,反对君主专制。谭嗣同对《大学》的释义沿着唯识宗与华严宗两条线索展开,认为唯识宗所讲的业识,就是孔学所讲的人心,唯识宗所讲的智慧,就是孔学所讲的道心。通过谭嗣同的诠释和解读,《大学》在内容上与侧重变易观、历史观的《春秋》呈现出明显不同,而平等是二者共同的主题。谭嗣同将对经典的解读与近代的价值理念相对接,既流露出对平等的推崇,又是对中国经典的创新性诠释。
[Abstract]:Tan Sitong's interpretation of "Spring and Autumn" is carried out along the direction and value purport of the great meaning of "Ram", so it is highly praised to "Biography of the Ram in the Spring and Autumn". He believed that: "the Spring and Autumn period" aims at the reform, and the contents of the book revolve around the theme of the reform; "the Spring and Autumn" adheres to the principle of "ruling by Heaven", which proves that Confucius stands for equality and opposes autocratic monarchy. Tan Sitong's interpretation of "University" began along the two clues of idealism and Huayen sect, and thought that the knowledge of the literate sect was the heart of the mind of Confucianism, the wisdom of the Confucian sect, and the Taoism of Confucianism. Through Tan Sitong's interpretation and interpretation, the content of "University" is obviously different from that of "Spring and Autumn", and the "Spring and Autumn" view of history is obviously different, and equality is the common theme between the two. Tan Sitong combined the interpretation of the classic with the modern value concept, showing the praise of equality as well as the innovative interpretation of Chinese classics.
【作者单位】：黑龙江大学哲学学院;
【分类号】：B254

【相似文献】