鲲鹏寓言的定位——兼谈一条读《庄》义法
发布时间：2018-11-21 20:08
【摘要】：庄学家们或将《庄子·逍遥游》中大鹏理解为庄子笔下象征最高精神境界的逍遥者形象,或将其理解为系列有待者中的一个阶梯,这些分歧的解决端赖于《逍遥游》各环节结构关系的理解和鲲鹏寓言在《逍遥游》中地位的界定。本文即由此争议出发,分析了种种分歧背后的根源,讨论了这种种理解的误区所在。文章进而提出了一种不同以往的文献理解方式,将鲲鹏寓言重新定位为《逍遥游》的引言,其意义在于兴发出"小大之辨"。在具体文本分析的基础上,提出了一条阅读《庄子》内七篇的义法:在注重获得庄子整体理解的同时,要特别注意保持各个不同语义层次文献的相对独立性。每一语义系统的意义应该首先在其系统内部推敲、寻求;任何来自此系统之外的意义要想安放到此系统的理解中,都必须和系统的语义无矛盾;一旦发生矛盾,首先应该作出调整的是来自系统外的理解。
[Abstract]:Zhuang scholars either understand "Zhuangzi Xiaoyao Tour" as Zhuangzi's portrayal of the highest spiritual state in his works, or interpret it as a staircase in a series of people waiting for him. The solution of these differences depends on the understanding of the relationship between the structure of each link and the definition of the status of the fable in the "Happy Tour". Based on the controversy, this paper analyzes the root of all kinds of differences and discusses the misunderstandings. The article further puts forward a different way of understanding literature, repositioning the Kunpeng fable as the introduction of "free and unfettered tour", the significance of which lies in issuing the "small big debate". On the basis of text analysis, this paper puts forward a method of reading seven articles in Zhuangzi: while paying attention to the whole understanding of Zhuangzi, we should pay special attention to maintaining the relative independence of the documents at different semantic levels. The meaning of each semantic system should first be examined and sought within the system, and any meaning from outside the system to be placed in the understanding of the system must have no contradiction with the semantics of the system; In the event of conflict, the first thing to adjust is understanding from outside the system.
【作者单位】： 杭州师范大学美术学院;清华大学人文学院;
【分类号】：B223.5
本文编号：2348142
[Abstract]:Zhuang scholars either understand "Zhuangzi Xiaoyao Tour" as Zhuangzi's portrayal of the highest spiritual state in his works, or interpret it as a staircase in a series of people waiting for him. The solution of these differences depends on the understanding of the relationship between the structure of each link and the definition of the status of the fable in the "Happy Tour". Based on the controversy, this paper analyzes the root of all kinds of differences and discusses the misunderstandings. The article further puts forward a different way of understanding literature, repositioning the Kunpeng fable as the introduction of "free and unfettered tour", the significance of which lies in issuing the "small big debate". On the basis of text analysis, this paper puts forward a method of reading seven articles in Zhuangzi: while paying attention to the whole understanding of Zhuangzi, we should pay special attention to maintaining the relative independence of the documents at different semantic levels. The meaning of each semantic system should first be examined and sought within the system, and any meaning from outside the system to be placed in the understanding of the system must have no contradiction with the semantics of the system; In the event of conflict, the first thing to adjust is understanding from outside the system.
【作者单位】： 杭州师范大学美术学院;清华大学人文学院;
【分类号】：B223.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 张宏生;形象与理念的完美结合——谈《庄子》寓言[J];求索;1989年04期
2 田永明;延伸思维漫谈[J];思维与智慧;2002年02期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 刘明武;几部中国典籍的是与非[N];中华读书报;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 赵苏;先秦时期象征观念建构的逻辑走向[D];西华师范大学;2015年
2 高其伦;《列子》寓言类编与研究[D];河北师范大学;2008年
3 秦春艳;法家思想视野中的《韩非子》寓言研究[D];广西师范大学;2014年
，本文编号：2348142
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2348142.html
