茶山的两互作卦法
发布时间：2018-12-16 10:48
【摘要】：茶山丁若镛在《周易四笺》中运用了推移、爻变、互体、物象四种解释方法,其中,两互作卦法属于互体之理论。两互法的由来可上溯至郑玄和虞翻,此法之运用则首见于完颜亮入寇时会稽之士所行之筮例,然其不过是一个事例而已。后来,吴澄构建了两互法体系。其体系与丁若镛两互作卦法大体一致,但又存在重要差异。吴澄的两互法基于邵雍的先天易学,而丁若镛则去除了先天易学的部分,仅择取其中的两互关系。另外,吴澄的两互卦遵循了秩序井然的规则,但这种规则性却未见于丁若镛的两互作卦法。总的来说,吴澄的两互法仅停留在形式的层面,而丁若镛却将两互作卦法广泛地运用于《易》辞的解释之中,这可以说是丁若镛对互体说与两互法的发展所做的重大贡献。
[Abstract]:Ding Ruoyong used four interpretation methods in the fourth Notes of the Book of changes of Cha Shan, namely, the change of the lines, the mutual body, and the image of the object, among which, the method of two interplay hexagrams belongs to the theory of the mutual body. The origin of the two mutual methods can be traced back to Zheng Xuan and Yu Quan. Later, Wu Cheng constructed a system of two mutual laws. The system is consistent with Ding Ruoyong's divinatory method, but there are important differences. Wu Cheng's two-interaction method is based on Shao Yong's innate Yi learning, while Ding Ruoyong removes the part of congenital Yi learning and chooses only the two interrelations. In addition, Wu Cheng's two divinatory diagrams follow orderly rules, but this rule is not found in Ding Ruoyong's divinatory pattern. On the whole, Wu Cheng's two reciprocal methods only remain at the formal level, while Ding Ruoyong applies the two interaction divinatory diagrams widely in the interpretation of Yi ci, which can be said to be the significant contribution made by Ding Ruoyong to the development of the theory of mutual body and the development of the two mutual methods.
【作者单位】： 庆北大学校人文大学;韩国成均馆大学儒学院;
【基金】：2016年韩国教育部和韩国研究财团Global Research Network program经费资助(NRF-2016S1A2A2912286)
【分类号】：B221;B312
本文编号：2382211
[Abstract]:Ding Ruoyong used four interpretation methods in the fourth Notes of the Book of changes of Cha Shan, namely, the change of the lines, the mutual body, and the image of the object, among which, the method of two interplay hexagrams belongs to the theory of the mutual body. The origin of the two mutual methods can be traced back to Zheng Xuan and Yu Quan. Later, Wu Cheng constructed a system of two mutual laws. The system is consistent with Ding Ruoyong's divinatory method, but there are important differences. Wu Cheng's two-interaction method is based on Shao Yong's innate Yi learning, while Ding Ruoyong removes the part of congenital Yi learning and chooses only the two interrelations. In addition, Wu Cheng's two divinatory diagrams follow orderly rules, but this rule is not found in Ding Ruoyong's divinatory pattern. On the whole, Wu Cheng's two reciprocal methods only remain at the formal level, while Ding Ruoyong applies the two interaction divinatory diagrams widely in the interpretation of Yi ci, which can be said to be the significant contribution made by Ding Ruoyong to the development of the theory of mutual body and the development of the two mutual methods.
【作者单位】： 庆北大学校人文大学;韩国成均馆大学儒学院;
【基金】：2016年韩国教育部和韩国研究财团Global Research Network program经费资助(NRF-2016S1A2A2912286)
【分类号】：B221;B312
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 宋载邵;李篪衡著《茶山丁若镛经学研究》[J];当代韩国;1997年02期
2 蒙培元;;丁若镛的“仁学观”[J];泉州师范学院学报;2006年01期
3 韩英;试论丁若镛对朱子学的批判[J];当代韩国;2003年03期
4 方浩范;束景南;;丁若镛实学中“仁”学思想体系的建构——孔孟仁学思想体系的复归与继承[J];孔子研究;2008年01期
5 姜日天;;丁若镛的四气本体[J];湖湘论坛;2012年06期
6 方浩范;;试论丁若镛的天理人欲思想[J];延边大学学报(社会科学版);2005年04期
7 冯琳;;丁若镛象数易学方法初探[J];周易研究;2011年01期
8 崔冠华;;丁若镛考辨古文《尚书》的基本理路——《梅氏书平》的逻辑基点[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2009年03期
，本文编号：2382211
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2382211.html
