《老子》无为思想及价值观辨正——基于理论理性的分析
发布时间：2019-03-01 10:06
【摘要】：如果为"无为"者是人而非拟人化的道或者天,那么这一概念表达的不是行为者与行为的承受者之间的关系,而是行为者与其所须遵守之道之间的关系,这时,《老子》"无为"的精确含义,实际是指行为者遵守道且对道本身不施加任何行为,而非像我们常认为的那样,仅仅是指对行为的承受者做出遵循道的行为,因为循道而为对行为的承受者而言也是一种作为而非无为。《老子》追求的最高价值不是道、自然无为或其他善,而是没身不殆和如其所是的长生久视,道、自然无为和其他善不过是实现这一目标或最高价值的最佳方式。从理论理性或思辨理性来看,根据《老子》所追求的最高价值及其"反者道之动"的观点可推知:"无为"不会只是主张"弱者道之用",而也会承认并要求"强者道之用";对于自然和社会中的恶之花,"无为"绝不会任其自然,而必然会有为以制止。
[Abstract]:If the "no" is a person rather than a personified channel or a day, then the concept expresses the relationship between the actor and the person who acts, but the relationship between the actor and the method to be observed, at which point, the precise meaning of the Lao-tzu> "no", The practice refers to the fact that the actor observes the channel and does not impose any act on the road itself, and not as we often think, merely means the act of following the act of the person who acts, because the following is also a way of acting as a rather than an act. The highest value of Lao-tzu's pursuit is not Tao, natural or other good, but it is not the best way to achieve this goal or the highest value. From the point of view of theoretical reason or speculative reason, according to the highest value and the "the movement of the counter-man" 's point of view of "Lao-tzu>", it can be inferred that the "no" will not only advocate the "for the weak", but also acknowledge and require the "the use of the strong"; for the flower of nature and society, the "no" will never be natural, And there must be an end to it.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B223.1
本文编号：2432328
[Abstract]:If the "no" is a person rather than a personified channel or a day, then the concept expresses the relationship between the actor and the person who acts, but the relationship between the actor and the method to be observed, at which point, the precise meaning of the Lao-tzu> "no", The practice refers to the fact that the actor observes the channel and does not impose any act on the road itself, and not as we often think, merely means the act of following the act of the person who acts, because the following is also a way of acting as a rather than an act. The highest value of Lao-tzu's pursuit is not Tao, natural or other good, but it is not the best way to achieve this goal or the highest value. From the point of view of theoretical reason or speculative reason, according to the highest value and the "the movement of the counter-man" 's point of view of "Lao-tzu>", it can be inferred that the "no" will not only advocate the "for the weak", but also acknowledge and require the "the use of the strong"; for the flower of nature and society, the "no" will never be natural, And there must be an end to it.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B223.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 吴猛强;;“理性”对待理性——兼论理性与法[J];华中科技大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
，本文编号：2432328
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2432328.html
