正名育类:亚里士多德《诗学》中的εποποιια
发布时间：2019-04-22 17:11
【摘要】：《诗学》是一部内传作品,亚里士多德的内传作品通常是严格理论性或者说哲学性作品,内容艰深,表达曲折、晦涩。传统上认为含混、粗略、残缺、脱漏、增衍的一些文本缺陷,极有可能是作者有意为之的隐微手法。εποποιια(史诗制作)是《诗学》中讨论的一个重要艺类,而《诗学》中对这一艺类的表述却多有变化,理论展开颇有玄奥。《诗学》1447a29-b2是《诗学》解释史上的一个疑难语句,绝大多数注疏者均将此句中的εποποιια一词作为衍文删除。本文从《诗学》本身论述结构上的严格对应关系,认定εποποιια并非衍文;并根据《诗学》特定解释传统的启发,揭示其中的隐微手法。释解1447a28-b2句意之疑难,廓清《诗学》中εποποιια之名与义。名实相符,而后名正言顺,进而正名育类,显豁出εποποιια在《诗学》中严格的、深层次的理论意涵。
[Abstract]:"Poetics" is an internal work. Aristotle's works are usually strictly theoretical or philosophical works, the contents of which are difficult, tortuous and obscure. Traditionally, it is believed that some defects in the text, which are vague, rough, incomplete, leaking and increasing, are probably the subtle techniques for which the author intended. 蔚-蟺-伪 (epic production) is an important art category discussed in Poetics. However, in Poetics, there are many changes in the expression of this art category, and the theory is rather mysterious. "Poetics" 1447a29-b2 is a difficult sentence in the history of "poetics" interpretation, and most of the thinkers delete the word 蔚 蟺 "伪" in this sentence as a derivative. This paper discusses the strict structural correspondence from the Poetics itself, and concludes that 蔚 蟺 伪 is not a derivative text, and reveals the subtle techniques according to the inspiration of the tradition of specific interpretation in Poetics. Explain the difficulty of 1447a28-b2 sentence meaning and clarify the name and meaning of 蔚 蟺 伪 in Poetics. The name and reality are in line with each other, and then the proper name is obeyed, and then the class of education is rectified, showing the strict and deep theoretical implication of 蔚 蟺 / 伪 in Poetics.
【作者单位】： 浙江省社会科学院;
【基金】：国家哲学社会科学基金青年项目“亚里士多德《诗学》疏证研究”阶段性成果,项目编号:13CWW035 中国博士后科学基金面上资助(第56批)项目“玛高琉斯的亚里士多德《诗学》评注研究”阶段性成果,项目编号2014M561508;中国博士后科学基金特别资助(第八批)项目“亚里士多德《诗学》研究:内传风格与哲学探究”阶段性成果,项目编号2015T80446
【分类号】：B502.233
本文编号：2463026
[Abstract]:"Poetics" is an internal work. Aristotle's works are usually strictly theoretical or philosophical works, the contents of which are difficult, tortuous and obscure. Traditionally, it is believed that some defects in the text, which are vague, rough, incomplete, leaking and increasing, are probably the subtle techniques for which the author intended. 蔚-蟺-伪 (epic production) is an important art category discussed in Poetics. However, in Poetics, there are many changes in the expression of this art category, and the theory is rather mysterious. "Poetics" 1447a29-b2 is a difficult sentence in the history of "poetics" interpretation, and most of the thinkers delete the word 蔚 蟺 "伪" in this sentence as a derivative. This paper discusses the strict structural correspondence from the Poetics itself, and concludes that 蔚 蟺 伪 is not a derivative text, and reveals the subtle techniques according to the inspiration of the tradition of specific interpretation in Poetics. Explain the difficulty of 1447a28-b2 sentence meaning and clarify the name and meaning of 蔚 蟺 伪 in Poetics. The name and reality are in line with each other, and then the proper name is obeyed, and then the class of education is rectified, showing the strict and deep theoretical implication of 蔚 蟺 / 伪 in Poetics.
【作者单位】： 浙江省社会科学院;
【基金】：国家哲学社会科学基金青年项目“亚里士多德《诗学》疏证研究”阶段性成果,项目编号:13CWW035 中国博士后科学基金面上资助(第56批)项目“玛高琉斯的亚里士多德《诗学》评注研究”阶段性成果,项目编号2014M561508;中国博士后科学基金特别资助(第八批)项目“亚里士多德《诗学》研究:内传风格与哲学探究”阶段性成果,项目编号2015T80446
【分类号】：B502.233
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 张平;;亚里士多德《诗学》中的悲剧定义新探——以诗艺的标准为分析点[J];美与时代(下);2014年01期
，本文编号：2463026
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2463026.html
