论康德实践判断中的想象力
发布时间:2019-05-28 13:10
【摘要】:在康德的批判哲学中,想象力是一种兼具直观和综合、接受性和自发性、再生性和生产性的自由的创造能力,它在康德的理论判断、审美判断中都发挥着重要的作用。然而在《实践理性批判》中,康德拒绝了想象力及其图型在实践判断中的居间角色,转而用知性的模型作为沟通道德法则和具体行为的桥梁。虽然想象力在实践判断中不再发挥中介作用,但是在实践判断中仍然有想象力的综合活动,而且在道德法则与自然法则的象征关系以及准则普遍化的过程中,想象力的作用都不可或缺。
[Abstract]:In Kant's critical philosophy, imagination is a creative ability with intuitionistic and comprehensive, receptive and spontaneous, renewable and productive freedom, which plays an important role in Kant's theoretical judgment and aesthetic judgment. However, in critique of practical reason, Kant refuses the intermediary role of imagination and its graph in practical judgment, and uses intellectual model as a bridge between moral law and concrete behavior. Although imagination no longer plays an intermediary role in practical judgment, there are still imaginative comprehensive activities in practical judgment, and in the process of symbolic relationship between moral law and natural law, as well as the generalization of norms, The role of imagination is indispensable.
【作者单位】: 华中科技大学哲学系;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金重大项目(12&ZD126)
【分类号】:B516.31
本文编号:2487091
[Abstract]:In Kant's critical philosophy, imagination is a creative ability with intuitionistic and comprehensive, receptive and spontaneous, renewable and productive freedom, which plays an important role in Kant's theoretical judgment and aesthetic judgment. However, in critique of practical reason, Kant refuses the intermediary role of imagination and its graph in practical judgment, and uses intellectual model as a bridge between moral law and concrete behavior. Although imagination no longer plays an intermediary role in practical judgment, there are still imaginative comprehensive activities in practical judgment, and in the process of symbolic relationship between moral law and natural law, as well as the generalization of norms, The role of imagination is indispensable.
【作者单位】: 华中科技大学哲学系;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金重大项目(12&ZD126)
【分类号】:B516.31
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李阳;冯鑫;;时间作为知性纯粹概念的图型法的合法性证明与演绎[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
2 刘凤娟;;时间图型作为第三者概念探析[J];理论月刊;2012年03期
3 卢海;;图型起源的先验论之谜——一种先天的认识能力如何可能?[J];沈阳工程学院学报(社会科学版);2011年02期
4 吴国栋;夏红各;;康德的图型说及其意义[J];经济与社会发展;2007年01期
5 戚公富;浅议康德“先验图型说”[J];天水行政学院学报;2004年02期
6 刘作;;从“中介”的角度看康德的图型学说[J];内江师范学院学报;2009年07期
7 卢海;;“隐匿”的桥——论康德图型的中介性[J];北京教育学院学报;2010年01期
8 张春静;张媛媛;;康德的图型理论[J];西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版);2012年05期
9 王建兵;;解读康德的图型[J];甘肃理论学刊;2007年02期
10 刘小燕,杨维东;图型形象思维的研究及应用前景[J];自然辩证法研究;2000年10期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 刘萌;论康德的“理性图型”[D];南开大学;2012年
2 贾大飞;康德的图型学说[D];山东师范大学;2005年
3 李一鸣;康德的时间图型[D];吉林大学;2011年
,本文编号:2487091
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2487091.html