巴特勒妇女同一性思想研究
发布时间：2019-06-21 11:12
【摘要】：美国著名的女性主义批评家和性别研究者朱迪斯.巴特勒作为当代性别研究领域的领军型人物,其极具颠覆性和前瞻性的性别理论对妇女运动和同志运动产生了深远的影响。目前,无论在西方还是国内,对巴特勒思想的研究主要集中在对“性别操演理论”的探讨上,这也成为对其性别思想讨论的重点和热点。巴特勒对女性同一性问题的解构和重建,不仅在破除传统性别实体理论中具有决定性作用,而且为女权主义破除传统性别认同理论,提倡多元、异质的女性身份提供了理论条件。巴特勒女性同一性思想的研究基础是批判传统的女性主体。她肯定了波伏娃、伊利格瑞以及克里斯蒂娃等人在动摇传统女性主体中的积极意义,但同时也对她们的理论局限进行了批判。在女性主体的问题上,巴特勒从主体的生成方式上发现了传统主体的建构性与单一化。她主张跳出单一稳定的主体限制,为主体的多元化和差异性设定肃清障碍。巴特勒认为,打破女性同一性的目的就是建立多元化、差异性的女性主体。她认为,波伏娃虽然指出了社会性别的建构性,但是没有触及到对自然性别的审视。而伊利格瑞认为女性只是一种差异的关系,力图通过建立“女性书写”建立女性主体,这样的做法依然为本质主义留下了空间。克里斯蒂娃的语言建构主体的思想为主体流动性提供了理论上的依据,但依然无法跳脱父权制社会的影响。巴特勒不仅肯定了社会性别的建构性,她认为生理性别也是社会建构的结果。巴特勒认为,性别是通过行为操演形成的。性别本身不是本质的,它是在后天社会实践中产生的。既然如此,对身体和性别的去魅是必要的。巴特勒首先对身体进行剖析,认为身体与性别之间的一致性也是建构出来的结果。随后指出,在反复的行为中,性别不但被铭刻也被固化。所以,特勒认为,性别的操演性决定了性别的流变性、不确定性,这为松动传统性别提供了理论上的依据。巴特勒对女性同一性的研究在性别领域具有极大的颠覆性。我们必须清楚它解构传统女性主体的真实意图,发现她性别思想的积极意义,但同时也要对其性别思想的局限性保持警惕。
[Abstract]:Judith, a famous feminist critic and gender researcher in the United States. As a leading figure in the field of contemporary gender research, Butler's subversive and forward-looking gender theory has had a profound impact on the women's movement and the gay movement. At present, whether in the West or in China, the study of Butler's thought mainly focuses on the discussion of "gender exercise theory", which has become the focus and hot spot of the discussion of his gender thought. Butler's deconstructing and reconstruction of the problem of female identity not only plays a decisive role in breaking down the traditional theory of gender entity, but also provides theoretical conditions for feminism to break down the traditional theory of gender identity and advocate pluralistic and heterogeneous female identity. The research basis of Butler's thought of female identity is to criticize the traditional female subject. She affirmed the positive significance of Bovova, Iligri and Christina in shaking the traditional female subject, but also criticized their theoretical limitations. On the problem of female subject, Butler found the constructiveness and unifying of traditional subject from the way of generating subject. She advocates breaking out of the single stable subject restriction and removing obstacles for the diversification and difference of the subject. Butler believes that the purpose of breaking female identity is to establish pluralistic and different female subjects. She believes that although Bovova pointed out the constructiveness of gender, she did not touch on the other examination of natural sex. Iligri believes that women are just a different relationship and tries to establish female subjects through the establishment of "female writing", which still leaves room for essentialism. Christina's thought of constructing subject in language provides a theoretical basis for the mobility of subject, but still can not get rid of the influence of patriarchal society. Butler not only affirmed the constructiveness of gender, but also believed that physiological sex was also the result of social construction. Butler believes that gender is formed through behavioral exercises. Gender itself is not essential, it is produced in the social practice the day after tomorrow. That being the case, disenchantment of the body and gender is necessary. Butler first analyzed the body and believed that the consistency between the body and gender was also the result of construction. Then it is pointed out that in repeated behavior, gender is not only engraved but also solidified. Therefore, Teller believes that the behavior of gender determines the mobility and uncertainty of gender, which provides a theoretical basis for loosening the traditional sex. Butler's study of female identity is subversive in the field of gender. We must be clear about its true intention of deconstructing the traditional female subject and find out the positive significance of her gender thought, but at the same time, we should also be alert to the limitations of her gender thought.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B712.59
本文编号：2504035
[Abstract]:Judith, a famous feminist critic and gender researcher in the United States. As a leading figure in the field of contemporary gender research, Butler's subversive and forward-looking gender theory has had a profound impact on the women's movement and the gay movement. At present, whether in the West or in China, the study of Butler's thought mainly focuses on the discussion of "gender exercise theory", which has become the focus and hot spot of the discussion of his gender thought. Butler's deconstructing and reconstruction of the problem of female identity not only plays a decisive role in breaking down the traditional theory of gender entity, but also provides theoretical conditions for feminism to break down the traditional theory of gender identity and advocate pluralistic and heterogeneous female identity. The research basis of Butler's thought of female identity is to criticize the traditional female subject. She affirmed the positive significance of Bovova, Iligri and Christina in shaking the traditional female subject, but also criticized their theoretical limitations. On the problem of female subject, Butler found the constructiveness and unifying of traditional subject from the way of generating subject. She advocates breaking out of the single stable subject restriction and removing obstacles for the diversification and difference of the subject. Butler believes that the purpose of breaking female identity is to establish pluralistic and different female subjects. She believes that although Bovova pointed out the constructiveness of gender, she did not touch on the other examination of natural sex. Iligri believes that women are just a different relationship and tries to establish female subjects through the establishment of "female writing", which still leaves room for essentialism. Christina's thought of constructing subject in language provides a theoretical basis for the mobility of subject, but still can not get rid of the influence of patriarchal society. Butler not only affirmed the constructiveness of gender, but also believed that physiological sex was also the result of social construction. Butler believes that gender is formed through behavioral exercises. Gender itself is not essential, it is produced in the social practice the day after tomorrow. That being the case, disenchantment of the body and gender is necessary. Butler first analyzed the body and believed that the consistency between the body and gender was also the result of construction. Then it is pointed out that in repeated behavior, gender is not only engraved but also solidified. Therefore, Teller believes that the behavior of gender determines the mobility and uncertainty of gender, which provides a theoretical basis for loosening the traditional sex. Butler's study of female identity is subversive in the field of gender. We must be clear about its true intention of deconstructing the traditional female subject and find out the positive significance of her gender thought, but at the same time, we should also be alert to the limitations of her gender thought.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B712.59
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 王楠;;从性别表演到文化批判:论朱迪斯·巴特勒的政治伦理批评[J];妇女研究论丛;2015年02期
2 方珏;;同一抑或差异:女性主义哲学的深层悖论[J];江海学刊;2012年03期
3 都岚岚;;西方文论关键词 性别操演理论[J];外国文学;2011年05期
4 柯倩婷;;身体与性别研究:从波伏娃与巴特勒对身体的论述谈起[J];妇女研究论丛;2010年01期
，本文编号：2504035
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2504035.html
