当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 哲学论文 >

存在理论中的生命、死亡和身体

发布时间:2019-07-12 18:34
【摘要】:传统的本体论先后经历了泛生机论的一元论、二元论和现代唯物主义和唯心主义的一元论,它们大都忽略了生命问题和身体问题,未来的新一元论应该让这些问题处于本体论的中心,要建立这种新一元论,需要融合吸收各种既有本体论的合理成分。泛生机论因其突出生命存在的解释原则而应重新受到重视,二元论揭示了生死、身体与心灵之间不可调和的矛盾,但它没有解决而是留下了问题,唯物论和唯心论各自从二元论终结的地方出发,试图执其一端却深陷其中,唯物论在对待生命问题方面优于唯心论,因为它更关注生命问题,而后者则回避了它。
[Abstract]:The traditional ontology has experienced the monism of pan-organism theory, dualism and the monism of modern materialism and idealism. Most of them ignore the problems of life and body. The new monism in the future should put these problems at the center of ontology. In order to establish this new monism, it is necessary to integrate and absorb all kinds of reasonable elements of existing ontology. Universal machine theory should be paid more attention to because it highlights the interpretation principle of life existence. Dualism reveals the irreconcilable contradiction between life and death and between body and mind, but it does not solve but leaves problems. Materialism and idealism each proceed from the end of dualism and try to hold one end of it, but they are deeply trapped in it. Materialism is superior to idealism in dealing with life problems, because it pays more attention to life problems. The latter, on the other hand, shunned it.
【作者单位】: 湘潭大学哲学系;株洲外国语教育集团;
【基金】:国家社科基金项目“反抗虚无——约纳斯生命哲学研究”(项目编号:13BZX018)的阶段性成果
【分类号】:B086

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 麦永雄;;论德勒兹生态美学思想:地理哲学、生机论与机器论[J];清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年06期



本文编号:2513900

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2513900.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户75777***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com