研究还是读后感——关于邓晓芒《康德〈纯粹理性批判〉句读》的几点看法
发布时间：2019-08-03 10:12
【摘要】：学术研究应注重文献的掌握:一手文献是基础;二手文献是起点。在此之上,努力发现问题和解决问题。做到这两点,不一定能够提出新的见解;做不到这两点,创新就是一句空话。阅读文献应注意三个层次:一是读懂说的是什么;二是读懂为什么这样说;三是评价说得对不对。只有在前两个层次的基础上,才能作出正确的评价。本文以邓晓芒教授关于康德著作的解读为例,对以上问题作出详细说明,并指出,缺乏二手文献的论著,不是研究,而只是读后感;而缺乏严谨的态度,读不懂文本说的是什么和为什么,就不会获得正确的文本解读。
[Abstract]:Academic research should pay attention to the mastery of literature: first-hand literature is the basis; second-hand literature is the starting point. On top of this, try to find and solve problems. If you do these two things, you may not be able to come up with new ideas; if you can't do these two points, innovation is empty talk. Three levels should be paid attention to in reading the literature: one is to read what is said, the other is to read why it is said, and the third is to evaluate whether it is right or not. Only on the basis of the first two levels can we make a correct evaluation. Taking Professor Deng Xiaomang's interpretation of Kant's works as an example, this paper explains the above problems in detail, and points out that the lack of second-hand literature is not a study, but only a sense of reading, and a correct text interpretation will not be obtained without a rigorous attitude and unable to understand what the text says and why.
【作者单位】： 清华大学人文学院哲学系;
【分类号】：B516.31-5
本文编号：2522495
[Abstract]:Academic research should pay attention to the mastery of literature: first-hand literature is the basis; second-hand literature is the starting point. On top of this, try to find and solve problems. If you do these two things, you may not be able to come up with new ideas; if you can't do these two points, innovation is empty talk. Three levels should be paid attention to in reading the literature: one is to read what is said, the other is to read why it is said, and the third is to evaluate whether it is right or not. Only on the basis of the first two levels can we make a correct evaluation. Taking Professor Deng Xiaomang's interpretation of Kant's works as an example, this paper explains the above problems in detail, and points out that the lack of second-hand literature is not a study, but only a sense of reading, and a correct text interpretation will not be obtained without a rigorous attitude and unable to understand what the text says and why.
【作者单位】： 清华大学人文学院哲学系;
【分类号】：B516.31-5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 侯振武;黄亚明;;康德启蒙观念中的知性与理性[J];内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年03期
，本文编号：2522495
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2522495.html
