职中教师职称评定有“三难”

发布时间：2018-05-01 18:01

本文选题：教师职称评定 + 高级职称　；参考：《职教论坛》1995年01期

【摘要】：正自1987年开展教师职评工作以来,七年的实践说明,职中教师评定中、高级职称确实存在着“三难”:一是难得到指标。中、高级教师职称的评定要教育主管部门给指标,不管一所学校有多少教师够条件评中高级职称,只要主管部门不分指标就不能评。而县教育主管部门分配指标总是两眼盯着每年能上几个甚至几十个大学生的普通中学。职中生考不上普大,所以得不到指标,即使能侥幸得到,那数量也不成比例。某县去年有中级指标55个,分到职中仅5个;高级指标11个,职中仅分到1个。一是难填各种职评表册。特别是教学质量表,更是难填,表上没有“考大学生人数”、“高考人平分数”、“最高或最低分”、“比全省高考人均分高或低多少”等。众所周知,职中的培养
[Abstract]:Since the work of teachers' job evaluation was carried out in 1987, seven years' practice shows that there are "three difficulties" in the evaluation of teachers' senior titles: first, it is difficult to obtain indicators. The evaluation of senior teacher's title requires the education department to give the index, no matter how many teachers in a school have enough conditions to evaluate the senior title, as long as the competent department does not distinguish the index, it can not be evaluated. The allocation index of the county education department is always fixed on the average middle school which can attend several or dozens of college students every year. Vocational school students can not get on the general university, so they can not get indicators, even if they get lucky, that number is not proportional. A county last year had 55 intermediate indicators, only 5 of the five; 11 senior indicators, only 1 in the post. First, it is difficult to fill out various job assessment forms. In particular, the teaching quality form is even more difficult to fill in. There is no "number of college students", "average score of college entrance examination", "highest or lowest score", "higher or lower score per person than the provincial college entrance examination" and so on. As we all know, vocational training
【作者单位】：四川省邻水县合流职业中学
【分类号】：G715.1

【相似文献】