藏医经典《杜德桑都卓玛》理论形成研究

发布时间：2018-04-27 07:33

本文选题：杜德桑都卓玛 + 理论形成　；参考：《青海大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：研究目的:根据藏医历史文献当中记载,面世于公元8至9世纪赞普时代的藏医经典文献《杜德桑都卓玛》在2004年经过西藏、四川等藏医药界人士搜集整理,四川人民出版社正式出版至今,藏医药学术界对此文献的研究还处于相当保守的初步阶段,此文献的研究进展微乎其微。通过此次研究生学习机会,本人慎重考虑后选择此文献为研究方向,并通过此次研究经过,阐明藏医经典《杜德桑都卓玛》的著作时间、著者情况、涉及内容等藏医学术问题。研究方法:运用文献研究的方法,整理公元8至11世纪期间出现的藏医药文献,比较研究《杜德桑都卓玛》与其它文献内容,分析和研究出《杜德桑都卓玛》的传承脉络,从而推断《杜德桑都卓玛》的成书时间、作者等研究问题。研究结果:《杜德桑都卓玛》的作者推断是“三大医学流派”代表之一,来自“冲姆”地,后来定居在西藏的大医师“娘赞巴西拉哈”所著,并确定此古籍名应是《仁乾桑都卓玛》,而并非现出版命名的《杜德桑都卓玛》。通过查阅相关文献,比较研究后,得出《仁乾桑都卓玛》是由根本部、注释部、“德嘎”部三大部分构成,后继出现的《杰巴米都常巴》及其它的注释本《尼第奥色》是《仁乾桑都卓玛》的第三部分“德嘎”部的注释本,《仁乾桑都卓玛》比《杰巴米都常巴》及其注释《尼第奥色》的成书时间较早,而且前者的作者推断是赞普时期的“娘赞巴西拉哈”,后者的作者是出生于11世纪的大成就者“塔波拉结”。通过《仁乾桑都卓玛》与一些普遍认为是吐蕃时期的典籍《月王药珍》、《比吉黄皮书函》中有很多内容相近相似之处,通过比较研究,提出了这三大巨著在同一时期面世,而且《仁乾桑都卓玛》的成书时间比《月王药珍》要早,比《比吉黄皮书函》较晚的事实论证。另外对此藏医经典古籍的结构框架、著述特点等方面也做了较为全面的阐述、分析和研究。
[Abstract]:Objective: according to the historical records of Tibetan medicine, the classic literature of Tibetan medicine, du Desang du Zhuoma, which was published in the 8th to 9th century AD Zanpu period, was collected and sorted out by Tibetan medicine professionals such as Tibet, Sichuan, etc., in 2004. Since the publication of Sichuan people's Publishing House, the research on this document in Tibetan medicine academic circles is still in a rather conservative preliminary stage, and the research progress of this document is very little. Through this graduate student study opportunity, I choose this document as the research direction after careful consideration, and through this research process, clarifies the Tibetan medicine classics "Dudesandu Zhuoma" the writing time, the author situation, involves the content and so on Tibetan medicine academic question. Methods: by using the method of literature research, the Tibetan medical literature appeared from the 8th to 11th century AD was sorted out. The contents of Dudsangduzoma and other documents were compared, and the lineage of Dudsangduzoma was analyzed and studied. Thus infer the book time, author and other research problems of Dudsangdu Zhuoma. The results: the authors of Dudsangdu Droma infer that they are one of the "three major medical schools", by Niangzambasilaha, a major physician from the Chum area and later settled in Tibet. It is determined that the name of this ancient book should be "Renqian Sang du Zhuoma", but not "Dudsangdu Zhuoma", which is now named. By consulting relevant documents and comparing research, it is concluded that "Renqian Sang du Zhuoma" consists of three major parts: the fundamental part, the annotation department, and the "Dega" department. The following notes, < Jabamidu Changba] and other annotations, < Nedioser > are the third part of "Dega" of "Renqian Sangduzoma", and the "Renqian Sangduzoma" is more than < Jabamidoumba] and its annotations. The book was written earlier. Moreover, the author of the former inferred that it was Niangzan Brabraha in Zamp's time, and that the latter was born in the 11th century by the great achievement, Tapolaj. Through "Renqian Sangdu Zhuoma" and some classic books, "Yue Yaozhen" and "Biji Yellow Book letter", which are generally considered to be in the period of Tubo period, there are many similarities. Through comparative study, it is proposed that these three great works will be published in the same period. Moreover, the book time of Ren Qian San du Zhuoma is earlier than that of Yueyue Yaozhen, and is later than that of Biji Yellow Book. In addition, the structure of the classical Tibetan medicine books, writing characteristics and other aspects of a more comprehensive elaboration, analysis and research.
【学位授予单位】：青海大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：R29

【相似文献】