法治环境下的信访制度改革研究

发布时间：2018-01-15 12:03

本文关键词：法治环境下的信访制度改革研究　出处：《山东大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：信访是中国源远流长的历史长河中的一种重要社会现象,是具有中国特色的一项政治制度,信访兴衰对中国的民主和法治建设有着重要的意义。信访制度作为我国公民参与政治的重要途径,是人民群众行使民主的重要形式,是公民救济的重要方式,而信访作为中国特有的政治、法律和社会问题,近年来越来越引起了理论界的高度关注。伴随我国社会改革的不断深入,深层次的矛盾不断显露,再加上信访制度本身的设计上的不合理性产生了政治参与的职能萎缩而权力救济的职能过度膨胀的发展趋势,给信访制度敲响了警钟,改革势在必行。在大力建设法治国家的今天,信访是取是舍,成为一个历史性的话题摆在了我们面前。要解决这一问题,我们首先要认识到信访制度在法治环境下的定位,认识到法治是信访制度赖以存在的制度环境,而正是法治的低迷成就了信访的发达。我国现行的信访制度表明,信访在保护弱势群体利益,提供民意表达渠道、促进立法、改善执法、改善司法和制度创新方面有着不可替代的优势,但存在整体框架不合理、处理方式不理想、缺乏程序性、信访工作者工作水平有待提高等很多因素。
[Abstract]:Petition is an important social phenomenon in the long history of China and a political system with Chinese characteristics. The rise and fall of petition is of great significance to the construction of democracy and the rule of law in China. As an important way for citizens to participate in politics, the petition system is an important form for the masses to exercise democracy and an important way for citizens to remedy. As a special political, legal and social problem in China, letters and visits have attracted more and more attention in the theoretical circle in recent years. With the deepening of social reform in our country, deep-seated contradictions have been revealed. In addition, the irrational design of the letter and visit system has caused the shrinking of the function of political participation and the excessive expansion of the function of power relief, which has sounded the alarm to the system of letters and visits. It is imperative to reform. Today, when we are building a country ruled by law, letters and visits are accepted or rejected, and become a historic topic in front of us. To solve this problem, we should first of all recognize the position of petition system in the environment of rule of law, and realize that the rule of law is the institutional environment on which the petition system depends. It is the low level of the rule of law that has made the petition developed. The current petition system in China shows that the petition is protecting the interests of the vulnerable groups, providing channels for public opinion expression, promoting legislation, and improving law enforcement. The improvement of judicial and institutional innovation has irreplaceable advantages, but there are many factors, such as unreasonable overall framework, unsatisfactory handling methods, lack of procedure, and the work level of petition workers need to be improved.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D920.0

【引证文献】