中美立体商标比较研究

发布时间：2018-01-17 17:04

本文关键词：中美立体商标比较研究　出处：《华中科技大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国在2001年新商标法中正式将“三维标志”列入了商标法保护的客体范围。自此正式确立了立体商标在商标法上的立法保护地位,而由此引发的立体商标的内涵界定问题,立体商标与其他知识产权的关系问题,立体商标的权利成立要件的确定问题不断出现,可以说不论是在理论研究上,还是在实务上,在我国还属新兴的商标类型的立体商标都面临着很大的考验。在美国,《兰哈姆法》通过对商业外观的保护实现对立体商标的保护。同时美国是保护商业外观相对较早的国家,有较为成熟的立法和丰富的判例为保护立体商标提供法律保障以及美国学者对立体商标的深入研究,都对完善我国立体商标的保护具有很强的借鉴意义。本文系统的论述中美两国的立体商标制度,并在比较的基础上对我国如何完善立体商标的法律构建和厘清理论争议提出建议和思考。首先本文从立体商标的内涵入手,对立体商标和商业外观这两个概念进行了分析。分析商业外观与立体商标概念的联系和区别,提炼了立体商标的法律特征,并阐述了对其保护的理论基础和现实意义。接着,采用理论分析和案例研究相结合的方式从我国立体商标的立法的现状,以及我国立体商标的权利成立要件(主要是显著性和非功能性),立体商标与其他知识产权的关系,三个方面介绍分析了我国了立体商标法律制度现状。然后,亦围绕这三个方面介绍了美国立体商标在此问题上的的现状和发展状况。最后,在总结的基础上比较性的分析了中美立体商标在这三个方面的差距和差异,围绕上述问题,充分借鉴了美国对商业外观保护的经验,提出了笔者自己的理论观点及立法建议。
[Abstract]:In 2001, in the new trademark law of our country, the "three-dimensional mark" was formally included in the object scope of trademark law protection. Since then, it has formally established the legislative protection status of three-dimensional trademark in trademark law. Therefore, the connotation of the three-dimensional trademark, the relationship between the three-dimensional trademark and other intellectual property rights, the establishment of the rights of the three-dimensional trademark issues continue to appear, can be said to be in the theoretical research. In practice, the three-dimensional trademark, which is also a new type of trademark in China, is facing a great test. In the United States, the "Lanham Act" through the protection of the commercial appearance to achieve the protection of three-dimensional trademarks, and the United States is a relatively early protection of the commercial appearance of the country. There are more mature legislation and rich jurisprudence to provide legal protection for the protection of stereoscopic trademarks, as well as the in-depth study of stereoscopic trademarks by American scholars, all of which have a strong reference significance for perfecting the protection of stereoscopic trademarks in China. This paper systematically discusses the three-dimensional trademark system between China and the United States. And on the basis of comparison on how to improve the legal construction of three-dimensional trademark and clarify the theoretical disputes put forward suggestions and thinking. First, this paper starts with the connotation of three-dimensional trademark. This paper analyzes the two concepts of stereoscopic trademark and commercial appearance, analyzes the relationship and difference between the concept of three-dimensional trademark and commercial appearance, and abstracts the legal characteristics of stereoscopic trademark. And elaborated on its protection of the theoretical basis and practical significance. Then, the use of theoretical analysis and case studies combined with the way from the status quo of the legislation of three-dimensional trademark in China. And the establishment of the rights of three-dimensional trademarks in China (mainly significant and non-functional, the relationship between three-dimensional trademarks and other intellectual property rights, three aspects of the introduction and analysis of the legal system of three-dimensional trademark status. Then. It also introduces the current situation and development of the American stereo trademark on this issue around these three aspects. Finally, on the basis of the summary, the author analyzes the gap and difference between the three aspects of the three-dimensional trademark in China and the United States. Based on the above problems, the author draws lessons from the experience of the United States in the protection of commercial appearance, and puts forward his own theoretical views and legislative suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D971.2;DD913

【参考文献】