作为证据的族谱——兼谈私文书的实质证明力

发布时间：2018-01-20 06:59

本文关键词： 族谱坟山私文书实质证明力湖南　出处：《河北法学》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：族谱是民国时期坟山案件中最常见的证据。在湖南,涉及族谱的坟山民事案件可分为争夺所有权和违反族约两类。在第一类案件的审理中,除了族谱,法官还会结合买卖契约等其他证据做出裁判;在第二类案件中,族谱单独使用也具有较高的证明力。这种根据案件类型区分族谱证明力的做法值得注意。尤其是一直以来,我国对私文书实质证明力的认定主要依靠法官的自由心证,其结果是容易导致司法权的滥用,虽然难以从规范层面进行限制,但在司法实践中有必要对私文书的制作主体、提供主体和制作时间等因素加以重视。
[Abstract]:Family tree is the most common evidence in the case of Tombs in the Republic of China. In Hunan Province, the civil cases involving family tree can be divided into two types: competing for ownership and violating the clan. In the first kind of cases, in addition to genealogy. Judges will also make decisions in conjunction with other evidence, such as contracts of sale and purchase; In the second category of cases, the use of genealogy alone also has a high probative power. This practice of differentiating the power of proof of genealogy according to the type of case is noteworthy, especially for a long time. In our country, the determination of the substantive proof of private documents mainly depends on the judge's free evidence, which results in the abuse of judicial power, although it is difficult to restrict from the normative level. However, in judicial practice, it is necessary to attach importance to the main body of making private documents, providing subject and making time.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目《法律文明史》(11&ZD081) 华东政法大学优秀博士学位论文培养项目上海市085工程“华东政法大学博士生海外调研计划”阶段性成果
【分类号】：D929
【正文快照】： 族谱是民国时期审理坟山案件的重要证据,据记载“桐城、望江、潜山、庐江、怀宁、英山等县,因坟山纠葛,涉讼于安徽高等审判厅及怀宁地方审判厅者,每月有数起或十余起不等,其提出之证据以宗谱为最普通[1]。”其实,在其他地方的坟山案件中,族谱也是最常见的证据形式。学界对族谱

【相似文献】