过程性行为理论在行政审判中的应用——对全国首例“斑马线罚款案”的法理反思

发布时间：2018-01-21 07:28

本文关键词： 过程性行为 “连续行为” 通行优先权法条修改　出处：《北京行政学院学报》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：全国首例"斑马线罚款案"中,法院以"连续行为"理论诠释斑马线上的"停步"也属"正在通行"的说法难以服人,真正适合为本案提供理论阐释的应为"过程性行为"而非"连续行为"理论。"连续行为"应为"数个相同行为的反复进行",与涵盖观望、迈步、停步、左顾、右盼、小跑等不同动作的"正在通过人行横道"并不符合。必须认识到相对人行为也可以"过程化",并将"过程性行为"引入《道路交通安全法》第47条,将"正在通行"修改为"通行过程中",并对行人在人行横道上的通行优先权附设"合法通行"的前提条件,将闯红灯通过人行横道和人行横道上非法逗留等情形剔除出法律保护范围之外。
[Abstract]:In the first "zebra crossing fine case" in the country, it is hard to convince the court to interpret the "stop" on zebra crossing with the theory of "continuous behavior". The theory of "process act" rather than "continuous act" should be suitable for providing theoretical explanation for this case. "continuous act" should be "repeated conduct of several identical acts", and cover wait-and-see, step, stop. Left look, right hope, trot and so on different movement "is passing through the crosswalk" does not accord with. Must realize the relative person behavior may also "the process". And the "process behavior" is introduced into Article 47 of the Road Traffic Safety Law, and "passing through" is amended to "in the course of traffic". In addition, the priority of pedestrian on the crosswalk is subject to the precondition of "legal traffic", and the situation of running red light through the crosswalk and illegal stay on the crosswalk is excluded from the scope of legal protection.
【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;
【基金】：山东省社会科学规划重点项目(13BFXJ02)
【分类号】：D920.5;D922.1
【正文快照】： 全国首例“斑马线罚款案”被最高人民法院研究室和中国审判杂志社共同评选为2015年十大典型案例之一,这不仅缘于本案的社会影响力、案情疑难复杂程度和审判结果的借鉴作用,以及在当下行人让行车辆成为“常事”的交通环境下,“斑马线前行人让车先行、司机仍被罚”所引发的不少

【相似文献】