博弈逻辑在法院调解制度中的应用

发布时间：2018-01-23 23:01

本文关键词： 博弈逻辑法院调解制度纳什均衡决策集决策蜈蚣博弈　出处：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：博弈逻辑作为一门新兴学科，被广泛应用到经济学、社会学等学科领域。对博弈逻辑本身的研究也存在动态博弈逻辑和静态博弈逻辑等多种方法。法院调解制度在我国具体国情下应运而生，是具有中国特色社会主义法律体系中的重要一环，但是在调解制度的具体执行过程中也存在一些问题，如调解和审判未完全分离，查清案件事实工作的忽视，这些情况直接导致了调解结案后的执行难，从而又进入判决程序的情况，没有达到法院调解制度创立的初衷。本文主要运用博弈逻辑的方法，分析在法院调解制度中当事人的思维过程，决策过程，从动态、静态两个过程与调解制度中宏观决策过程，微观个案分析过程为两条主线对法院调解制度从开始到调解结案，当事人的博弈思维进行分析。梳理整合出法院调解制度的整个博弈逻辑规律，并从博弈逻辑的视角提出如何完善我国法院调解制度，更好的实现调解制度的创立初衷。文章共分为四个部分：第一部分是介绍博弈论和博弈逻辑的研究进程，，博弈逻辑的研究方法等内容。目的是对博弈逻辑做一个宏观性的阐述，对博弈逻辑作出初步分类，以达到为第三部分剖析整个法院调解制度中博弈逻辑过程进行初步的铺垫；第二部分从法理学与法的社会学角度阐述当前我国法院调解制度的现实价值，并对国外类似的制度（法院附设调解制度等）作出比较研究，通过这两方面分析说明我国法院调解制度现实效果与创设时所预期的社会实效差距和原因；第三部分从宏观和围观两个层面对法院调解制度进行博弈逻辑分析，论证整个调解制度中当事人的思维过程，决策的出发点与当事人之间共同取得最优决策集的博弈逻辑规律。用博弈逻辑这一全新的视角来研究法院调解制度的整个静态和动态博弈逻辑规律；最后一部分通过前文的研究，创造性的架构法院调解制度中当事人思维规律的博弈逻辑模型（我将其命名为纳什均衡点环绕理论），通过这一模型更直观的说明整个法院调解过程中影响当事人决策思维的不同原因，并得出如何对我国当前法院调解制度的“博弈逻辑”方法完善。
[Abstract]:As a new discipline, game logic is widely used in economics. There are many methods in the study of game logic, such as dynamic game logic and static game logic. The court mediation system emerges as the times require under the specific conditions of our country. It is an important link in the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics, but there are some problems in the concrete implementation of the mediation system, such as the incomplete separation of mediation and trial, and the neglect of finding out the facts of the case. These circumstances directly lead to the difficulty of execution after the settlement of mediation, and thus to the situation of judgment procedure, which does not meet the original intention of the establishment of court mediation system. This paper mainly uses the method of game logic to analyze the thinking process and decision-making process of the parties in the court mediation system, from the dynamic and static two processes and the macro-decision-making process in the mediation system. The microcosmic case analysis process consists of two main lines: from the beginning to the end of mediation, the game thinking of the parties is analyzed, and the whole game logic law of the court mediation system is sorted out. From the perspective of game logic, the author puts forward how to perfect the court mediation system and realize the original intention of the mediation system. The article is divided into four parts: the first part is to introduce the game theory and game logic research process, game logic research methods and so on. To make a preliminary classification of game logic, in order to achieve the third part of the analysis of the whole court mediation system in the process of game logic preliminary foreshadowing; The second part expounds the realistic value of the court mediation system in our country from the angle of sociology of jurisprudence and law, and makes a comparative study on the similar systems abroad (the court-attached mediation system, etc.). Through the analysis of these two aspects, this paper explains the gap and reasons of the actual effect of the court mediation system in our country and the social actual effect expected when it was created. The third part analyzes the game logic of the court mediation system from the macro level and the onlookers level, and demonstrates the thinking process of the parties in the whole mediation system. The starting point of the decision and the game logic law of the optimal decision set are obtained between the parties. The whole static and dynamic game logic law of the court mediation system is studied with the game logic. The last part through the previous study, the creative structure of the court mediation system in the party thinking rules of the game logic model (I will call it Nash equilibrium point surround theory). Through this model, we can more intuitively explain the different reasons that affect the decision-making thinking of the parties in the whole court mediation process, and find out how to perfect the "game logic" method of the current court mediation system in our country.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2;D90-051

【参考文献】