唐律司法渎职罪研究

发布时间：2018-01-30 07:19

本文关键词： 唐律渎职司法刑罚特点立法　出处：《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：各级国家机关公务人员对其职责的规范履行是确保国家机关正常、良好运作的关键,更是关乎到黎民的生计与一国的兴亡。而司法机关作为国家机关的主要组成机构,在完善司法体系和维护法律制度中具有重要作用。司法工作者若有渎职行为,不仅会影响司法活动的规范进行,降低人民对司法工作者职务行为规范性、客观性、公正性的信任,更会导致国家与人民利益的重大损失。社会的公平正义最后都需依赖司法公正来维护,保障社会公正就必须先要做到司法公正,因此要着重规范与监督司法工作者的职务行为。在中国两千多年的封建时期,历代统治阶级自然认识到司法的重要性,十分注重对司法官员的选任与监管。唐代作为中国古代最为辉煌繁荣的朝代,其在司法渎职法制方面的成果也具有标杆意义。本文立足于唐律规定的司法渎职犯罪,综合运用历史分析方法、比较分析方法和语义分析方法,剖析唐律司法渎职罪的主要内容,特点及作用,影响及启示。大致从以下几个方面加以阐述:首先,分析司法渎职罪的概念和构成要件,然后介绍从夏商周至唐的司法渎职罪的法律起源和演变。其次,对《唐律》中司法渎职犯罪相关法律作详细解读,将所规定的司法渎职犯罪按照追捕、受理、审讯、断罪、执行、监禁六个司法程序整理归类,然后论述分析,总结出唐代司法渎职犯罪的立法原则和特点、局限及其历史影响。最后,将唐代司法渎职罪与我国现行刑法中的司法渎职罪对比分析,发现现行立法中的缺陷和不足,然后从司法渎职罪体系设置、犯罪主观方面、法定刑的设定三个方面提出一些想法和建议,望有助于完善当下关于司法渎职犯罪的立法。
[Abstract]:It is the key to ensure the normal and good operation of state organs that the public servants at all levels perform their duties in a standardized manner. It is also related to the livelihood of Li Min and the rise and fall of a country. The judiciary, as the main component of state organs, plays an important role in perfecting the judicial system and maintaining the legal system. Not only will it affect the conduct of judicial activities, but also reduce the people's trust in the normative, objective and impartial behavior of judicial workers. It will lead to the great loss of the interests of the country and the people. In the end, the fairness and justice of the society must be maintained by the judicial justice, and the protection of the social justice must first be done with the judicial justice. Therefore, we should focus on standardizing and supervising the duty behavior of judicial workers. During the feudal period of more than 2,000 years in China, the ruling class naturally realized the importance of judicature. The Tang Dynasty, as the most glorious and prosperous dynasty in ancient China, paid much attention to the selection and supervision of judicial officials. Its achievements in the judicial malfeasance legal system also have benchmarking significance. This article is based on the judicial malfeasance crime stipulated by the Tang Law, comprehensive use of historical analysis method, comparative analysis method and semantic analysis method. This paper analyzes the main content, characteristics and functions, influence and enlightenment of judicial malfeasance of Tang Dynasty. It is explained from the following aspects: first, the concept and constitutive elements of judicial malfeasance are analyzed. Then it introduces the legal origin and evolution of judicial malfeasance from Xia Shang Zhou to Tang Dynasty. Secondly it makes a detailed interpretation of the relevant laws of judicial malfeasance crime in Tang Law and accepts the prescribed judicial malfeasance crime according to the pursuit and acceptance. Trial, conviction, execution, imprisonment of six judicial procedures organized and classified, and then discussed and analyzed, summed up the Tang Dynasty judicial malfeasance crime legislative principles and characteristics, limitations and historical impact. Finally. By comparing the judicial malfeasance crime in Tang Dynasty with the judicial malfeasance crime in the current criminal law of our country, we find the defects and deficiencies in the current legislation, and then set up the system of judicial malfeasance crime from the subjective aspect of crime. This paper puts forward some ideas and suggestions on the establishment of legal penalty in order to perfect the current legislation on the crime of judicial malfeasance.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D929

【相似文献】