侵权禁令与执法替代:风险社会公共治理的新思路

发布时间：2018-02-27 20:58

  本文关键词： 公共治理 财产规则 侵权禁令 行政管制　出处：《法制与社会发展》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：追求公共善治需要合适的治理工具。作为事先手段的财产规则是转型社会复杂博弈结构下实现公共治理的最优方式,它契合了风险社会的安全诉求,能实现对损害预防的有效激励。研究表明,私人是比政府更好的财产规则的实施者,这意味着侵权禁令是比行政管制更优的治理路径。在转型中国,侵权禁令的推广适用将在很大程度上补充甚至替代行政执法,成为风险社会公共治理的新动力。要利用侵权禁令来提升公共治理水平,必须进行全方位的机制创新,使其更加符合公共决策的需要。
[Abstract]:The property rule as a prior means is the best way to realize the public governance under the complex game structure in the transitional society, which accords with the security demand of the risk society. Research shows that the private sector is the executor of better property rules than the government, which means that tort bans are a better way to govern than administrative regulation. The popularization and application of tort injunction will supplement or even replace administrative law enforcement to a great extent and become a new motive force for public governance in risk society. In order to improve the level of public governance by using tort injunctions, we must carry out all-round mechanism innovation. To make it more in line with the needs of public decision-making.
【作者单位】： 中山大学法学院;
【基金】：2016年度中国法学会部级法学研究课题“损害赔偿诉讼中的司法认知与策略行为研究”(CLS(2016)D03) 2014年“广东特支计划”青年文化英才项目的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D920.0
，

本文编号：1544287