从程序自然法的角度看司法解释的目标

发布时间：2018-03-02 16:29

本文选题：法律解释　切入点：司法解释的目标　出处：《华东政法大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国的法律解释包括司法解释、立法解释和行政解释。司法解释是连接立法与法律适用的纽带，发挥着统一法律适用的功能，具有十分重要的理论价值和实践意义。通过法律解释方法可以保证法律适用的统一，防止司法活动的任意性、保证司法公正、维护法律权威。而不同的法律解释目标的理论会影响对法律解释方法的理解，在这个问题上的分歧会影响法律的确定性。富勒提出的程序自然法即法律的内在道德是对传统自然法的超越，其中包含的法治原则是对法律制度提出的要求，真正的法律应当具备各项法治原则，否则就是不合格的法律。法律解释作为法律制度的一部分，也应当具备程序自然法的内在要求：公开性、明确性、官方行动与公布的规则一致性。结合上述法治原则，对于思考司法解释的目标有很大的帮助。程序自然法的内在要求支持了司法解释目标倾向客观论，最高人民法院的地位和功能决定了司法解释的统一法律适用的任务。司法解释必须遵守现行法律文本的规定，受其约束，解释的范围不能超越审判实践的具体法律适用问题，它只能是对理解和适用现有法律文本的理解和帮助，赋予抽象的法律条文在个案中符合具体情况的指导意义和适用性，但不能改变现有法律，不能违背法律。本文分为三个部分，第一部分先介绍了国外关于法律解释目标的理论，主要是主观说和客观说这两类最常见的观点，还专门介绍了美国的主观说、动态说和文本说为后文分析富勒的程序自然法中的法律解释思想作铺垫；然后论述了中国法律语境下的法律解释与司法解释的区别和特点。第二部分通过对富勒的程序自然法理论的分析，，从中汲取有关法律解释目标的原则：法律的公开性、明确性和官方行动与公布的规则相一致性，并分析了这些原则中体现出的正义、秩序和效率的价值对探寻我国司法解释目标的意义。第三部分主要围绕最高人民法院的司法解释展开，讨论其形式、地位和统一法律适用的目标，分析了司法解释在制定时所遵守的价值取向和指导思想决定了司法解释的价值归属和理性内涵，这也是司法解释目标的意义所在。
[Abstract]:Explain the law of our country including judicial interpretation, legislative interpretation and administrative interpretation. The judicial interpretation is a link of applicable legislation and law, play a unified legal function, it has very important theoretical value and practical significance. Through the legal interpretation method can guarantee the uniform application of the law, to prevent arbitrariness of judicial activities, ensure judicial justice, safeguard the legal authority and legal interpretation. Different target theory will affect the interpretation of understanding of the law, the division will determine the legal effect.
The inherent moral procedure natural law proposed by Fuller that the law is beyond the traditional natural law, which includes the principle of rule of law is put forward on the legal system, the real law should have the principle of the rule of law, otherwise it is not qualified. The legal interpretation of the law as a part of legal system, internal requirements should also have natural procedures method: open, clear, official action and rules published by consistency. According to the principle of the rule of law, is of great help for the consideration of the aim of judicial explanation. Inherent requirement of procedural natural law to support our interpretation of goal orientation objective theory, the status and function of the Supreme People's court decided the uniform law applicable task the judicial interpretation of the judicial interpretation of the provisions. Must abide by the current legal texts, bound by the scope, can not explain the specific application of law in judicial practice beyond question, it It can only help and understand and apply the existing legal texts, and give the guiding meaning and applicability of the abstract legal provisions in specific cases, but it can't change the existing laws, and can't violate the law.
This paper is divided into three parts, the first part introduces the theory about the goal of legal interpretation is mainly foreign, subjective and objective of these two kinds of the most common view, but also specially introduced the subjective, dynamic and text says for the analysis program of natural law in Fuller's thought of legal interpretation to pave the way; and then discusses the differences and characteristics of legal interpretation in the context of China law and judicial interpretation. The second part through the analysis procedure of natural law theory of Fuller, learn the goals related to the principles of legal interpretation: from the publicity of the law, the rules clear and official action and released phase consistency, and analyzes the embodiment these principles of justice, order and efficiency value to explore the goal of China's judicial interpretation of the significance. The third part focuses on the judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court, to discuss the form, status As well as the goal of unified law application, this paper analyzes the value orientation and guiding ideology of judicial interpretation in the formulation, and determines the value attribution and rational connotations of judicial interpretation, which is also the significance of the objective of judicial interpretation.

【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D920.4

【参考文献】