温和法律父爱主义之辨

发布时间：2018-03-03 17:11

本文选题：温和父爱主义　切入点：父爱主义　出处：《天府新论》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：温和父爱主义长期以来被视为父爱主义的一个重要类别而隶属于父爱主义,但二者之间其实存在着紧张的对立关系。温和父爱主义的核心是:只有主体真实的决定才值得尊重。因此,帮助主体实现其出于实质自愿而做的选择、并不顾及主体的利益增进与否,这才是温和父爱主义的本相。但这又恰恰与"为了主体利益而强行限制主体自由"的父爱主义相矛盾。因此,温和父爱主义并非父爱主义,而是一项独立的限制自由的原则。在此基础上,进一步对温和父爱主义的分类进行探究,以期拓宽其在我国部门法领域的实践应用。
[Abstract]:Moderate fatherhood has long been regarded as an important category of fatherhood and subservient to it. But there is actually a tense antagonism between the two. The core of moderate fatherhood is that only the real decision of the subject is worthy of respect. This is the essence of moderate fatherhood, regardless of whether the interests of the subject are enhanced or not. However, this contradicts the patriarchal doctrine of "imposing restrictions on the freedom of the subject for the sake of the interests of the subject." therefore, moderate patriarchalism is not patriarchalism. It is an independent principle of restricting freedom. On this basis, the classification of moderate paternity is further explored in order to broaden its practical application in the field of department law in China.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D90-052

【相似文献】