当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

“公共利益”的法理逻辑及本土化重探

发布时间:2018-03-11 11:30

  本文选题:公共利益 切入点:征收 出处:《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:公共利益生成于立宪时代,它作为一项价值原则改塑了强权征收。由于我国的宪法品格中有着改造社会的宏大愿景与集体优位的权利观念,故而公共利益带有"能动型"的性情倾向,使得政府征收较为频繁。但是,公共利益绝不是吞噬公民财产的利维坦,更非"钉子户"现象泛滥成灾的缘由,将公共利益关进文义牢笼中的论见,既失公允,也有方向错误。既然频繁的征收不可避免,就应该构建相应的司法监督机制,避免出现"钉子户"现象,兹以保障公共利益的圆满实现,此方为正道。
[Abstract]:Public interest came into being in the constitutionalism era, as a principle of value, it changed the expropriation of power. Because of the great vision of reforming society and the concept of collective superiority in the constitutional character of our country, As a result, the public interest has a "dynamic" disposition, which makes the government levy more frequently. However, the public interest is by no means the leviathan that devours the citizens' property, and it is not the reason why the phenomenon of "nail households" is overrun. The view that the public interest is locked up in the cage of culture and righteousness is unfair and wrong. Since frequent collection is inevitable, the corresponding judicial supervision mechanism should be set up to avoid the phenomenon of "pegged households". This is the right way to ensure the satisfactory realization of the public interest.
【作者单位】: 南京大学法学院;
【基金】:2016年度江苏省普通高校学术学位研究生科研创新计划(KYZZ16_0007)
【分类号】:D90;D921

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前5条

1 杨涛;;市长难拔“钉子户”[J];检察风云;2006年11期

2 戴煌;;“钉子户”不能挑战法律[J];江淮法治;2007年10期

3 庄文京;;“钉子户”古已有之[J];大科技(百科新说);2013年05期

4 董震;;“钉子户”带来的迟延交房纠纷[J];检察风云;2013年17期

5 王甜 ,鲁山峰;揭开一个“暴发户”的面纱——孙迎鹏特大偷税案件审判纪实[J];企业活力;1993年07期

相关重要报纸文章 前9条

1 张永t,

本文编号:1597971


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1597971.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户56fc7***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com