私力救济的正当性研究

发布时间：2018-03-13 21:34

本文选题：私力救济　切入点：公力救济　出处：《辽宁大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在当代中国,私力救济因其自身原因和其他一些社会囚素有其存在的正当性及其合理性。实践也证明,游离于法律边缘的私力救济作为公力救济的重要补充,对于提高效率、实现正义、维护当事人的合法权益有重大作用。甚至在某些情况下,由于其实效性、成本低、效率高而对于当事人权利的保障比公力救济更直接、快捷,也更能体现当事人的主体参与性,也更容易贴近人性。因此,有必要通过法律实现私力救济,使其纳入法治轨道,以完善我国的司法制度,满足公众对权利救济的合理预期。选定私力救济作为研究对象,并非无意证明私力救济相比公力救济更为优越,抑或相反。这并不重要。事实上,不同的纠纷解决方式各有利弊,并没有谁更为优越。关键在于哪种方式更适合于特定的个体,以及他何以选择。本文结构分为三个部分：第一部分主要是介绍私力救济的概念特征以及其他的一些基本内容；第二部分是文章的重点部分,主要是从社会文化、法经济分析和价值等多方面对私力救济的正当性进行探讨,说明私力救济在当代社会存在的正当性及合理性；第三那部分着重对私力救济的未来发展方向即私力救济的法律化进行介绍。通过本文对私力救济正当性的分析达到两个目的：第一,使人们能够对私力救济有一个全面的认识和了解,并能认真、理性地对待私力救济。第二,为人们提供一种多元化的纠纷解决方式。在论证私力救济正当性的过程中,通过与公力救济(主要是诉讼制度)的对比,从侧面反映出诉讼制度中存在的一些不足之处,希望对此有多启发,能促进诉讼制度的完善和进一步发展。把私力救济这一诉讼领域的课题从法理的角度去研究它,不仅提升了私力救济的理论深度,而且把理论法学与部门法学紧密地结合起来,具有一定的理论意义。研究私力救济不仅具有理论意义,而且也具有重要现实意义。通过论证私力救济的正当性,使人们能够对私力救济有正确的认识并在面对它时能够理性、认真对待。这样在现实生活中,当发生权利纠纷当事人寻求救济时能够指导人们在面对自己的个案纠纷时,能够分析公、私力两种救济的利弊,选择适用纠纷解决的最佳途径,从而能够更有效地并最大限度地保护当事人的合法权益。
[Abstract]:In contemporary China, private relief is justified and reasonable because of its own reasons and some other social prisoners. Even in some cases, because of its effectiveness, low cost and high efficiency, the protection of the rights of the parties is more direct and faster than public relief. Therefore, it is necessary to realize private relief through law and bring it into the orbit of rule of law in order to perfect the judicial system of our country and meet the public's reasonable expectation of right relief. Choosing private relief as the object of study is not unintentional to prove that private relief is superior to public remedy, or vice versa. This is not important. In fact, different dispute resolution methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. No one is superior. The key lies in which way is more suitable for a particular individual and why he chooses. The structure of this paper is divided into three parts: the first part mainly introduces the concept of private relief and other basic content; The second part is the key part of the article, mainly from the social culture, legal and economic analysis and value of various aspects of the legitimacy of private relief, to explain the legitimacy and rationality of the existence of private relief in contemporary society; The third part focuses on the future development of private relief, that is, the legalization of private relief. Through the analysis of the legitimacy of private relief in this paper, two purposes are achieved: first, So that people can have a comprehensive understanding and understanding of private relief, and can seriously and rationally deal with private relief. Second, to provide people with a variety of dispute resolution. In the process of proving the legitimacy of private relief, Through the comparison with public relief (mainly litigation system), this paper reflects some deficiencies in litigation system from the side, and hopes to enlighten it, which can promote the perfection and further development of litigation system. The study of private relief, a subject in the field of litigation, not only promotes the theoretical depth of private relief, but also closely combines theoretical jurisprudence with departmental jurisprudence. The study of private relief is not only of theoretical significance, but also of practical significance. By demonstrating the legitimacy of private power relief, people can have a correct understanding of private power relief and be able to be rational in the face of it. Take it seriously. In real life, when the litigants in a right dispute seek relief, they can guide people to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of public and private remedies in the face of their own individual disputes, and choose the best way to apply to dispute resolution. In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties more effectively and to the maximum extent.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90

【相似文献】