日本集体自卫权的法理解释与解禁历程

发布时间：2018-03-18 02:23

本文选题：集体自卫权　切入点：国际法　出处：《东北师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2014年7月及2015年9月,日本相继解禁了集体自卫权和通过了新安保法案。集体自卫权的解禁,标志着日本“专守防卫”政策的质变,其军事行动力将呈现扩大化的趋势;而新安保法案的颁布实施,则为这一扩大化趋势提供了稳固的法律保障。对于国内政治由否认侵略历史的保守势力来主导的日本来说,这些动向无疑是会引起周边邻国及国际社会的高度关注及警惕的。本文立足于法理与实情,全面地就集体自卫权在国际法与(日本)国内法上的法律性质,以及在日本战后历史上的展开与推进进行了探讨与分析。这既具有分析日本集体自卫权的法律特点、行使目的、实施方式等理论上的意义,又具有从日本解禁集体自卫权来分析国际关系的现实性意义。文章分为四个部分。第一章阐述与分析了集体自卫权的法理问题。本章首先从国际法和日本宪法的角度分别对集体自卫权进行了解读,并在最后证明了禁止行使集体自卫权的日本宪法与承认国家享有集体自卫权的国际法,在本质上是不冲突的。第二章探讨了历史视角下日本集体自卫权的发展情况。本章首先探讨了日本充实集体自卫权行使基础的五个阶段,随后就对这以上发展阶段起推动作用的内、外部两股力量进行了分析。第三章对安倍内阁解禁集体自卫权的相关问题进行了分析。该章从三个层次对安倍解禁集体自卫权的目标指向进行了解读,并驳斥了安倍内阁以“限定容忍”的观点来谋求解禁集体自卫权的手法,最后就集体自卫权在新安保法案中的呈现特点以及集体自卫权在实施中的灵活性进行了解读。第四章分析了日本解禁集体自卫权的影响。该章从法律层次上批判了安倍内阁解禁集体自卫权的方式以及其在解禁过程中采取的某些行为对法律秩序造成的破坏,并从现实层面上认为集体自卫权的解禁既会为日本开启“发展盟友模式”,推动日本军工产业发展,也会不利于维护东北亚以及南海区域的安全与稳定。面对日本解禁集体自卫权可能引发的担忧,一方面我们期待日本能持续地珍视和平,另一方面我们在通过对话与合作的方式争取日本在和平的道路上持续前行的同时,也应保持着有理、有力、有节的斗争。
[Abstract]:In July 2014 and September 2015, Japan lifted the right of collective self-defense and passed the new security law. The lifting of the right of collective self-defense marked the qualitative change of Japan's "special defense" policy, and its military action will show a trend of expansion. The promulgation and implementation of the new security bill provides a firm legal guarantee for this trend of expansion. For Japan, which is dominated by conservative forces that deny its history of aggression, There is no doubt that these trends will arouse great concern and vigilance from neighboring countries and the international community. This article, based on legal theory and facts, comprehensively deals with the legal nature of the right of collective self-defence in international law and (Japan) domestic law. It also discusses and analyzes the development and promotion of Japan's postwar history, which has the theoretical significance of analyzing the legal characteristics, the purpose and the mode of implementation of the right of collective self-defence in Japan. The article is divided into four parts. The first chapter expounds and analyzes the legal principle of collective self-defence. From the perspective of collective self-defense, the right to collective self-defense is interpreted, And finally proved that the Constitution of Japan, which prohibits the exercise of the right to collective self-defence, and the international law which recognizes the right of the State to collective self-defence, The second chapter discusses the development of Japan's right to collective self-defence from the historical perspective. This chapter first discusses the five stages of Japan's enrichment of the basis of the exercise of the right to collective self-defence. And then within the context of these stages of development, The third chapter analyzes the issues related to Abe's cabinet's right to lift the ban on collective self-defense. This chapter interprets the goal of Abe's right of collective self-defense from three levels. And refuted Abe's cabinet's approach of seeking the lifting of the right to collective self-defence with the view of "limited tolerance", Finally, the paper interprets the characteristics of collective self-defence right in the new security act and the flexibility of collective self-defence right in the implementation. Chapter 4th analyzes the influence of the right of collective self-defense in japan. This chapter criticizes the right of collective self-defense from the legal level. The manner in which Abe's cabinet lifted the right to collective self-defence and the damage to the law and order caused by certain acts it has taken in the process of lifting the ban, And from a realistic level, it is believed that the lifting of the right to collective self-defence will not only open the "model of developing allies" for Japan, but also promote the development of Japan's military industry. It will also be detrimental to the maintenance of security and stability in Northeast Asia and the South China Sea. In the face of concerns that may arise from Japan's right to lift its ban on collective self-defence, on the one hand, we expect Japan to continue to cherish peace. On the other hand, while we strive for Japan's sustained progress on the road of peace through dialogue and cooperation, we should also maintain a rational, vigorous and disciplined struggle.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D931.3;DD912.1

【参考文献】