“法不禁止皆自由”的私法精义

发布时间：2018-04-02 17:07

本文选题：最大自治空间　切入点：禁令　出处：《中国社会科学》2014年04期

【摘要】："法不禁止皆自由"的精准含义是只要行为人不实施侵犯他人合法的私人领域这一为法所禁止的不正义行为,他就享有充分的自由。"法不禁止皆自由"力图宣示,扣除禁令后剩余的所有空间均为自由的领地,由此凸显了自由为"扣减权"的无所不包的特性,从而营造了最大的自治空间。从微观层面看,它主要适用于仅涉及行为人的涉己行为、无涉第三人的合意行为等场合。在立法中禁令不足、行为虽不违反禁令但违反公序良俗等情形,以及法定主义模式的作用领域,该命题的适用受到限制。从宏观层面看,它具有空泛性,仅依凭其自身,并不足以有效捍卫私人的意思自治。只有使禁令保持一般性、目的独立性、程序性或形式性、底线性等品质,这一命题才能真切地构建起最大的自治空间。
[Abstract]:The precise meaning of "all freedom by law does not prohibit" is that the perpetrator shall enjoy full freedom as long as the perpetrator does not commit an injustice prohibited by law against the lawful private sphere of another person. "The law does not prohibit all freedom "try to declare that all remaining space after deducting the ban is a free territory, thus highlighting the all-encompassing characteristic that freedom is the" right of deduction ", thus creating the largest autonomous space.From the micro level, it is mainly applicable to the situation involving only the behavior of the person concerned, but not the act of consent of the third party.The application of this proposition is restricted because of the insufficiency of prohibition in legislation, the violation of public order and good customs, although the behavior does not violate the prohibition, and the field of action of the statutory model.On the macro level, it is vague and not sufficient to defend private autonomy.Only by keeping the prohibition general, objective independent, procedural or formal, bottom line and so on, can this proposition truly construct the largest autonomous space.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学民商经济法学院;
【基金】：2013年教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划中国政法大学优秀中青年教师培养支持计划的成果之一
【分类号】：D920.0

【参考文献】