中美行政立法程序比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-08 19:03

本文选题：程序　切入点：行政立法　出处：《北京林业大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：现代法治注重程序法控权。我国相关法律关于行政立法程序的规定,相比以往,在程序的可行性和民主性两个方面都有所发展,特别是体现行政立法民主的公众参与机制在规范和实践层而都发展迅速。然而,现行行政立法程序在确保立法质量和立法公正方而,与应然层面相比较,与日益增长的公众对参与立法的利益诉求相比较,仍然存在很大差距。本文的日的在于通过介绍和评论中美两国在行政立法程序方面的理论与实践框架,展现两国在行政立法领域公众参与的样态。美国的行政立法程序以《联邦行政程序法》为核心规范,其行政立法程序是较为完备和详细的。在立法动议、立法信息公开、立法听证等环节,其许多做法值得我们借鉴。
[Abstract]:Modern rule of law pays attention to the control of procedural law.Compared with the past, the relevant laws of our country have developed in both the feasibility and the democracy of the procedure, especially the mechanism of public participation, which embodies the democracy of the administrative legislation, has developed rapidly in both the normative and practical levels.However, there is still a big gap between the current administrative and legislative procedures in ensuring the quality and fairness of legislation, in comparison with the level of necessity, and in comparison with the growing interest demands of the public to participate in the legislation.The purpose of this paper is to show the public participation in the field of administrative legislation by introducing and commenting on the theoretical and practical framework of administrative and legislative procedures between China and the United States.The administrative and legislative procedure in the United States is based on the Federal Administrative procedure Act, and its administrative and legislative procedure is relatively complete and detailed.In legislative motions, legislative information publicity, legislative hearings and other links, many of its practices are worthy of our reference.
【学位授予单位】：北京林业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.1;D971.2

【参考文献】