中韩医疗侵权责任研究

发布时间：2018-04-14 18:54

  本文选题：医疗侵权责任 + 证明责任　； 参考：《黑龙江大学》2016年博士论文

【摘要】：随着医疗纠纷不断增多,医患关系恶化问题已成为当前严重的社会问题。通过法律制度安排,有效解决医患矛盾,是当前法律界的共识。韩国与中国地理相近,历史背景,文化背景,经济发展程度,医疗发展水平,民众法律意识等方面都有相似的地方。因此,韩国在医疗侵权责任立法及解决医疗纠纷司法实践,具有较大借鉴意义。本文全面系统地介绍了中国和韩国在医疗侵权责任立法及司法实践,归纳总结了我国医疗侵权责任制度存在的问题与不足,并以这些问题为导向,深入对比分析了韩国在这些领域的经验做法,从比较法视角,系统提出了缓和证明责任冲突、明确因果关系认定规则,解决医疗鉴定双轨制弊端,改革医疗侵权赔偿标准等医疗侵权责任制度重点领域的对策,以期为完善我国医疗侵权责任制度。本文认为,在完善医疗侵权责任制度方面,要综合考虑立法的稳定性和司法的灵活性,将举证责任分配规则、因果关系认定规则交由法院和法官,通过行使自由裁量权来处理,并提高司法案例的指导作用,统一司法审判标准。而医疗鉴定制度改革,行业调解前置,改革损害赔偿标准等,则需要从立法层面作出回应,对相关法律法规作出修改,进而完善我国医疗纠纷解决机制。
[Abstract]:With the increasing of medical disputes, the deterioration of doctor-patient relationship has become a serious social problem.It is the consensus of the legal profession to solve the doctor-patient contradiction effectively through the legal system arrangement.There are similarities between South Korea and China in geography, historical background, cultural background, economic development level, medical development level and people's legal consciousness.Therefore, the legislation of medical tort liability and the judicial practice of resolving medical disputes in South Korea are of great significance.This paper comprehensively and systematically introduces the legislation and judicial practice of medical tort liability in China and South Korea, summarizes the problems and shortcomings of the medical tort liability system in China, and takes these problems as the guidance.By comparing and analyzing the experience and practice of Korea in these fields, from the perspective of comparative law, this paper systematically proposes to ease the conflict of burden of proof, clarify the rules of identifying causality, and solve the malpractice of two-track system of medical appraisal.In order to perfect the system of medical tort liability in China, we should reform the key areas of medical tort liability system, such as the standard of medical tort compensation.In order to perfect the system of medical tort liability, we should consider the stability of legislation and the flexibility of judicature, give the rules of distribution of burden of proof and rules of causality to the courts and judges, and deal with them through the exercise of discretion.And improve the guiding role of judicial cases, unified judicial standards.However, the reform of medical appraisal system, industry mediation and the reform of the standard of compensation for damages need to respond from the legislative level and modify the relevant laws and regulations so as to perfect the medical dispute resolution mechanism in our country.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D931.26;D923
，

本文编号：1750579