公开征集立法项目建议的国内外比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-15 15:20

本文选题：立法项目 + 征集建议　；参考：《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：中国公开征集立法项目建议已从实践逐步走向制度化,在践行这一民主、科学立法决策的重要实践中,立法机关已经获得了一些有益经验,但也存在良好实践难以稳定持续推进、参与权利缺乏制度保障、信息公开相对不畅以及反馈机制有待健全等缺憾。与中国相关实践与制度形成鲜明对比的是,国外一些征集建议主体能够主动公开立法背景资料、构建并实际运作征集意见专业网络平台、积极推进公民参与立法教育和培训,甚至已形成了适度限制征集建议使用范围的理念。总结和借鉴这些对比性经验,中国有必要考虑采取健全公开征集立法项目建议制度、深化立法信息公开制度、提升公众的立法参与能力、完善沟通交涉以及反馈机制等措施,以科学、合理地解决中国当前的制度与实践问题。
[Abstract]:China's open solicitation of legislative proposals has gradually moved from practice to institutionalization. In the practice of this important practice of democracy and scientific legislative decision-making, the legislature has gained some useful experience.However, there are some shortcomings such as the difficulty of steady and continuous promotion of good practice, the lack of institutional protection of the right to participate, the relative unobstructed information disclosure and the lack of sound feedback mechanism.In contrast to the relevant practice and system in China, some foreign solicitation and suggestion subjects can actively open the legislative background information, construct and actually operate the professional network platform for soliciting opinions, and actively promote citizens' participation in legislative education and training.It has even formed the idea of moderately limiting the scope of use of proposals for solicitation.To sum up and draw lessons from these comparative experiences, it is necessary for China to consider such measures as improving the proposal system for open solicitation of legislative projects, deepening the system of publicity of legislative information, enhancing the public's ability to participate in legislation, and perfecting communication, negotiation and feedback mechanisms.Scientific and reasonable solutions to China's current system and practice.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学法律学院;
【分类号】：D911;D920.0

【相似文献】