英国学术期刊出版制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-20 23:10

本文选题：英国学术期刊 + 出版制度　；参考：《长安大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着社会整体的不断进步,文化软实力逐渐进入人们的视线,其对经济、政治及军事的影响力越来越大,成为一个国家立足的根基之一。学术期刊作为文化软实力的一个方面也越来越被各国重视,因此本文期望想通过研究在学术期刊界较有影响力的英国学术期刊的出版制度来为我国学术期刊出版制度的改善提供借鉴。本文首先说明英国学术期刊出版制度的形成与发展,通过对英国学术期刊出版制度形成过程的分析解构,探析英国学术期刊出版制度产生和发展的内在逻辑和机制。分别阐述学术期刊出版制度从王权时代、英国资产阶级革命时代到协会权威的形成过程,在这一过程中英国出版行业从最早的特许审查制度,即每一本要出版的书刊都要经过王室规定的审查机构进行严格的审查,以控制损害国家名誉和反宗教的书刊的出版,巩固国家政权的稳定,到1688年光荣革命后,确立了君主立宪制度,思想和言论变得相对自由,再到1695年许可证制度最终被取消,英国的出版业制度最终向出版后审查发展,形成了出版后审查和登记制相结合的出版制度。其次,分析英国学术期刊出版的需求,探析英国学术期刊出版制度形成的内因。然后,从政府、市场、社会三个层面对英国出版管理主体进行介绍,具体分为相关的政府部门、行业协会以及出版企业,并分析这些政府部门、行业协会及出版机构在学术期刊的出版中发挥的作用。接下来,对所查找到的与学术期刊出版相关的法律制度、行业协会制度以及出版机构制度进行阐述。法律方面主要以《诽谤法》、《版权法》、《数据保护法》为主,行业协会方面主要以出版商协会和书商协会的制度准则为例,出版机构方面以剑桥大学出版社的出版制度和施普林格·自然出版集团的编辑出版制度为例进行说明。最后对英国学术期刊出版制度进行总结,并对比中英两国学术期刊出版制度的主要差异,分析我国学术期刊存在的问题及原因,根据英国学术期刊出版制度的成功经验及我国的大环境,有取舍地对其进行借鉴,为我国学术期刊出版制度的改革提出合理的建议,以图完善我国学术期刊出版制度。
[Abstract]:With the continuous progress of the whole society, the soft power of culture gradually enters the sight of people, its influence on economy, politics and military becomes more and more, and becomes one of the bases of a country. As an aspect of the soft power of culture, academic journals have been paid more and more attention to by many countries. Therefore, this paper hopes to provide reference for the improvement of the publishing system of academic journals in our country by studying the publishing system of British academic journals, which is more influential in academic journals. This paper first explains the formation and development of the publishing system of British academic journals. Through the analysis and deconstruction of the forming process of the publishing system of British academic journals, this paper probes into the internal logic and mechanism of the emergence and development of the publishing system of British academic journals. This paper expounds the formation process of academic periodical publishing system from Wang Quan's time, the British bourgeois revolution era to the association's authority. In this process, the British publishing industry changes from the earliest franchise review system. That is, every book to be published is subject to strict censorship by the censors as stipulated by the royal family, in order to control the publication of books and periodicals that are harmful to the country's reputation and anti-religion, and to consolidate the stability of the state power. After the glorious revolution of 1688, After the constitutional monarchy was established, thought and speech became relatively free, and then in 1695 the licensing system was finally abolished, and the British publishing industry system finally developed to the post-publication review system, which formed the publishing system which combined the post-publication censorship with the registration system. Secondly, it analyzes the demand of the publication of British academic journals, and analyzes the internal reasons for the formation of the publishing system of British academic journals. Then, from the three levels of government, market and society, the main body of British publishing management is introduced, which is divided into relevant government departments, industry associations and publishing enterprises, and analyzes these government departments. The role played by trade associations and publishing institutions in the publication of academic journals. Then, the related legal system, trade association system and publishing institution system are discussed. The main legal aspects are libel law, copyright law, and data protection law, while trade associations mainly take the system standards of publishers' associations and booksellers' associations as examples. The publishing institutions are illustrated by the publishing system of Cambridge University Press and the editing and publishing system of Springer Nature Publishing Group. Finally, this paper summarizes the publishing system of academic journals in Britain, compares the main differences between China and the United Kingdom, and analyzes the problems and causes of academic journals in China. According to the successful experience of British academic periodical publishing system and the general environment of our country, we can draw lessons from it in order to put forward reasonable suggestions for the reform of our country's academic periodical publishing system in order to perfect our country's academic periodical publishing system.
【学位授予单位】：长安大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D956.1;DD913

【相似文献】