检察机关基于法律错误提起再审抗诉之探讨——以马乐案为例

发布时间：2018-04-20 23:26

本文选题：马乐案 + 法律错误　；参考：《河南社会科学》2016年10期

【摘要】：马乐案基于法律错误而再审改判,除刑事实体法上关涉援引法定刑之解释,亦有程序探讨之价值。基于宪法上的法律监督职责,检察机关对确有错误的已生效裁判提起再审抗诉有其积极意义。然而,实事求是、有错必纠的价值取向却与法的安定性、裁判的既判力理论冲突,也与禁止双重危险、有利被告等原则相悖,不符合司法规律和诉讼原理的要求。应在追求实体公正与维护法的安定性、裁判的既判力之间寻求平衡,秉持现代司法理念,确立禁止双重危险原则。应将审判监督程序分为对事实错误的再审程序和对法律错误的特别抗诉程序,并区分有利于被告人的再审和不利于被告人的再审。对事实错误,通常只能提出有利于被告人的再审,目的在于实现个案公正;对法律错误,应由最高人民检察院向最高人民法院提出特别抗诉加以纠正,目的在于保证法律统一正确实施。
[Abstract]:Ma Le case was retried and revised on the basis of error of law, which not only related to the interpretation of invoking legal penalty in criminal substantive law, but also had the value of procedural exploration. On the basis of the legal supervision duty of the constitution, it is of positive significance for the procuratorial organ to file a retrial and protest against the invalid judge. However, the value orientation of seeking truth from facts and correcting mistakes is in conflict with the stability of law, the theory of res judicata, the prohibition of double danger and the principle of favouring the defendant, which does not accord with the requirements of judicial law and principle of litigation. It is necessary to seek a balance between the pursuit of substantive justice and the stability of the law, the res judicata of the referee, uphold the modern judicial concept, and establish the principle of prohibiting double danger. The procedure of trial supervision should be divided into the retrial procedure for the error of fact and the special protest procedure for the mistake of law, and a distinction should be made between the retrial in favor of the defendant and the retrial against the defendant. For factual errors, usually only a retrial in favour of the defendant can be made, with the purpose of realizing the fairness of the case, and the Supreme people's Procuratorate shall make a special protest to the Supreme people's Court to correct the errors of law. The purpose is to ensure the correct implementation of the law.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院;
【基金】：基金项目:国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心成果
【分类号】：D925.2;D920.5

【相似文献】