法律解释对象研究

发布时间：2018-04-22 17:21

本文选题：法律解释 + 法律解释对象　；参考：《辽宁师范大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,我国学者在法律解释问题领域取得了丰硕的研究成果,然而,对法律解释对象的研究还处在起步阶段,没有得到学者应有的重视。法律解释对象是法律解释学中的一个基本理论问题,法律解释学的许多理论问题都源于对法律解释对象的认识,对法律解释对象的研究不但有助于我们深入研究法律解释的相关理论问题,而且对于建立科学合理的法律解释体制也有着重要的意义。在当下的中国,对法律解释对象问题的研究还有助于加快我国司法改革的进程,推进我国的法治建设。本文就法律解释对象问题的一般理论进行抽象研究为中心,注意将理论研究与具体研究相结合,从法律解释对象的本体论和方法论两个大方面来讨论。具体采用的研究方法主要有历史考察方法、价值分析方法和法社会学方法。本文分为五部分,结构如下: 引言部分笔者描述了国内外对法律解释对象问题研究的现状,从理论和实践两个方面分析了论题的意义,最后介绍了本文的写作方法和创新点。第一章首先从司法者的立场对法律解释的概念进行了界定,在此基础上,重新界定了法律解释对象的范围,认为法律解释对象包括法律渊源和事实两个方面。第二章从本体论角度对法律解释对象进行研究。首先阐述了法律渊源的定义和特征,并着重研究了当代中国的法律渊源,如制定法、法律解释、判例、习惯、政策、正义观念。然后,在描述了事实和案件事实的含义的基础上,重点对法律事实的定义、特征和分类进行阐释。对法律解释对象进行本体论研究,为对法律解释对象进行方法论研究奠定了前提和基础。第三章从方法论角度对法律解释对象进行研究。对法律渊源和事实进行解释,进而形成三段论推理中所需要的大前提(裁判依据)和小前提(法律事实),是对法律解释对象进行方法论研究的意义之所在。在本文中,笔者认为法律渊源的解释方法主要有文义解释方法、法意解释方法和目的解释方法,事实的解释方法主要有逻辑方法、经验方法和自然科学方法,并对诸方法的内容、适用情形及其相互关系进行了深入的研究。结语部分笔者重申了对法律解释对象进行研究的必要性和重要意义。
[Abstract]:In recent years, Chinese scholars have made great achievements in the field of legal interpretation. However, the research on the object of legal interpretation is still in its infancy and has not received the attention it deserves. The object of legal interpretation is a basic theoretical problem in the field of legal hermeneutics. Many theoretical problems of legal hermeneutics originate from the understanding of the object of legal interpretation. The research on the object of legal interpretation is not only helpful for us to study the relevant theoretical problems of legal interpretation, but also of great significance to the establishment of a scientific and reasonable legal interpretation system. In current China, the research on the object of legal interpretation is also helpful to speed up the process of judicial reform and promote the construction of the rule of law in our country. This paper focuses on the abstract research on the general theory of the object of legal interpretation, pays attention to the combination of the theoretical research and the concrete study, and discusses the object of legal interpretation from two aspects: ontology and methodology. The specific research methods are historical investigation method, value analysis method and legal sociology method. This paper is divided into five parts, the structure is as follows: In the introduction part, the author describes the current situation of the research on the object of legal interpretation at home and abroad, analyzes the significance of the topic from two aspects of theory and practice, and finally introduces the writing method and innovation of this paper. The first chapter defines the concept of legal interpretation from the standpoint of the judiciary. On this basis, the author redefines the scope of the object of legal interpretation, and holds that the object of legal interpretation includes two aspects: the source of law and the fact. The second chapter studies the object of legal interpretation from the perspective of ontology. Firstly, the definition and characteristics of legal sources are expounded, and the sources of law in contemporary China, such as statutory law, legal interpretation, jurisprudence, custom, policy, and the concept of justice, are emphatically studied. Then, on the basis of describing the meaning of facts and case facts, the definition, characteristics and classification of legal facts are explained. The ontological study of the object of legal interpretation lays a foundation for the methodological study of the object of legal interpretation. The third chapter studies the object of legal interpretation from the perspective of methodology. The interpretation of legal sources and facts, thus forming the major premise (the basis of judgment) and the small premise (legal fact) required in syllogism reasoning are the significance of methodological research on the object of legal interpretation. In this paper, the author thinks that the interpretation methods of legal origin mainly include the methods of literal interpretation, the method of interpretation of legal meaning and the method of interpretation of purpose, the method of interpretation of facts mainly includes logical method, method of experience and method of natural science. The content, application and relationship of these methods are also studied. In the conclusion part, the author reiterates the necessity and significance of the research on the object of legal interpretation.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90

【引证文献】