论中国古代“令”的变迁、性质及其地位
发布时间:2018-05-08 06:30
本文选题:令的变迁 + 令的内容 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:律令法系是中华法系的另一表述方式,可见令在中国古代法律体系中的重要地位。令在先秦即已存在,当时是国家最高统治者下发的专门性命令。秦始皇改制使得令得以独立发展,令也开始具有概括性。汉代对繁多的令进行了初步的整理活动,但是秦汉时期律令混杂的局面始终没有改变,直至魏晋修订新律才将律令之间的界限划分清晰。隋唐时期令发展完善,令作为国家基本的制度性法典与律并肩的地位最为突出,因此,唐令成为后世沿革袭用的法律圭臬。宋令之初沿用唐令而没有专门的令典,《天圣令》是宋朝的第一部令典但是施行时间并不长久,其他单行的令文不断问世改变了令典的稳定性。明令对唐宋之令的继承并不显著,相反因循元《通制条格》的内容较多,明令在数量上较之唐令也大幅度减少。总之令在宋明时期地位明显下降,到了清代则不见令这一法律形式的存在,不过一些明令的条文演化成了条例被编附在《大清律例》之中。
[Abstract]:The law system is another expression of the Chinese law system, which shows its important position in the ancient Chinese legal system. The order already existed in the pre-Qin Dynasty, when it was a special order issued by the supreme ruler of the country. Qin Shihuang's reform made it possible to develop independently and began to have generality. The Han Dynasty carried on the preliminary collation activity to the numerous orders, but the Qin and Han dynasties period law mixed situation has not changed all the time, until Wei Jin revised the new law to divide the boundary between the laws and orders clearly. The Sui and Tang dynasties made the development perfect and the status of the country as the basic institutional code and law was the most prominent. Therefore, the Tang Ling became the law standard of the later generations. At the beginning of the Song Dynasty, the Tang order was adopted without a special order-code. The "Tiansheng order" was the first oracle of the Song Dynasty, but the time was not long. Other single-line articles constantly changed the stability of the oratory. The inheritance of Ming order to Tang and Song Dynasty is not remarkable. On the contrary, the content of Ming order is much more than that of Tang and Song Dynasty, and the quantity of Ming order is also greatly reduced compared with that of Tang Ling. In short, the status of Song Ming obviously declined, but in the Qing Dynasty, there was no such form of law, but some of the provisions of the Ming Dynasty evolved into regulations to be annexed to the Qing laws and regulations.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D929
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 南玉泉;秦令的演化及其在法律形式中的地位[J];考古与文物;2005年02期
2 钱大群;律、令、格、式与唐律的性质[J];法学研究;1995年05期
3 霍存福;;论礼令关系与唐令的复原——《唐令拾遗》编译墨余录[J];法学研究;1990年04期
4 大庭修;马小红;;律令法系的演变与秦汉法典[J];中外法学;1990年01期
5 张建国;秦令与睡虎地秦墓竹简相关问题略析[J];中外法学;1998年06期
,本文编号:1860325
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1860325.html